Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Monitoring plastic ingestion by the northern fulmar Fulmarus glacialis in the North Sea
This map shows the geographic impact of Eric Stienen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eric Stienen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eric Stienen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eric Stienen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eric Stienen. The network helps show where Eric Stienen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eric Stienen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eric Stienen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eric Stienen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Eric Stienen. Eric Stienen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Adriaens, Peter, et al.. (2012). Hybrid gulls in Belgium - an update. Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute). 105. 530–542.1 indexed citations
12.
Degraer, S., et al.. (2011). Diet and foraging behaviour of oystercatchers (Haematopus ostralegus) and grey plovers (Pluvialis squatarola): The importance of intertidal flats. 10(2). 167–184.1 indexed citations
13.
Derous, Sofie, M. Tundi Agardy, H. Hillewaert, et al.. (2007). A concept for biological valuation in the marine environment. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.52 indexed citations
14.
Courtens, Wouter, Eric Stienen, & Nicolas Vanermen. (2006). Zeevogels en zeezoogdieren van de Vlakte van de Raan. Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute).2 indexed citations
15.
Stienen, Eric. (2006). Living with gulls. VLIZ Special Publication.1 indexed citations
16.
Stienen, Eric. (2005). Living with gulls: trading off food and predation in the Sandwich Tern Sterna sandvicensis. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).8 indexed citations
17.
Debacker, Virginie, Freddy Coignoul, Krishna Das, et al.. (2004). North Sea seabirds and marine mammals: pathology and ecotoxicology. Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège).1 indexed citations
18.
Stienen, Eric, et al.. (2002). Toekomstperspectieven voor kustbroedvogels in de voorhaven van Zeebrugge: adviesnota in het kader van de instandhouding van de populaties van kustbroedvogels. Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute).1 indexed citations
19.
Stienen, Eric, et al.. (2002). Verstoken van verstoring: het belang van de Baai van Heist als rust- en broedgebied voor vogels. Flanders Marine Institute (Flanders Marine Institute).3 indexed citations
20.
Stienen, Eric, et al.. (2000). Reflections of a specialist : Patterns in food provisioning and foraging conditions in sandwich terns Sterna sandvicensis. Ardea. 88(1). 33–49.60 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.