Matt Field

15.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
202 papers, 10.5k citations indexed

About

Matt Field is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Matt Field has authored 202 papers receiving a total of 10.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 104 papers in Applied Psychology, 75 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 60 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Matt Field's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (102 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (60 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (44 papers). Matt Field is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral Health and Interventions (102 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (60 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (44 papers). Matt Field collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Matt Field's co-authors include W. Miles Cox, Brendan P. Bradley, Karin Mogg, Paul Christiansen, Andrew Jones, Ingmar H. A. Franken, Jon C. Cole, Brian J. Eastwood, Andrew J. Goudie and Reínout W. Wiers and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Matt Field

197 papers receiving 10.3k citations

Hit Papers

Attentional bias in addic... 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 250 500 750 1000

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Matt Field 4.1k 3.6k 3.5k 2.8k 2.0k 202 10.5k
Ingmar H. A. Franken 4.2k 1.0× 5.1k 1.4× 2.0k 0.6× 4.3k 1.6× 1.1k 0.5× 255 12.7k
Michael A. Sayette 2.8k 0.7× 2.3k 0.6× 2.4k 0.7× 1.7k 0.6× 1.5k 0.7× 147 8.4k
Reínout W. Wiers 7.5k 1.8× 6.1k 1.7× 7.0k 2.0× 6.1k 2.2× 4.5k 2.2× 478 20.8k
Mark S. Goldman 2.0k 0.5× 2.8k 0.8× 3.8k 1.1× 2.6k 0.9× 6.8k 3.3× 172 12.3k
James MacKillop 2.0k 0.5× 1.4k 0.4× 3.3k 0.9× 2.9k 1.1× 3.3k 1.6× 319 9.9k
Lara A. Ray 1.7k 0.4× 1.5k 0.4× 1.8k 0.5× 1.6k 0.6× 3.8k 1.9× 287 9.5k
Mike Rinck 4.9k 1.2× 3.5k 1.0× 1.9k 0.5× 3.0k 1.1× 602 0.3× 243 8.8k
Robert O. Pihl 2.4k 0.6× 2.1k 0.6× 1.2k 0.3× 4.5k 1.6× 2.8k 1.4× 244 12.6k
Kent E. Hutchison 1.3k 0.3× 2.7k 0.8× 914 0.3× 1.4k 0.5× 2.0k 1.0× 225 9.5k
Antonio Verdejo‐García 2.7k 0.7× 3.8k 1.1× 1.3k 0.4× 4.3k 1.6× 1.9k 1.0× 323 12.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Matt Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matt Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matt Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matt Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matt Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matt Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matt Field. The network helps show where Matt Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matt Field

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matt Field. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matt Field based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matt Field. Matt Field is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dora, Jonas, Maxwell Shinn, Elizabeth C. Neilson, et al.. (2025). How people decide to consume (more) alcohol when feeling stressed. Addiction. 121(2). 370–387.
3.
Garnett, Claire, Melissa Oldham, Olga Perski, et al.. (2024). Do engagement and behavioural mechanisms underpin the effectiveness of the Drink Less app?. npj Digital Medicine. 7(1). 174–174. 2 indexed citations
5.
Oldham, Melissa, Gemma Loebenberg, Matt Field, et al.. (2023). Methodological Insights on Recruitment and Retention From a Remote Randomized Controlled Trial Examining the Effectiveness of an Alcohol Reduction App: Descriptive Analysis Study. JMIR Formative Research. 8. e51839–e51839. 3 indexed citations
6.
Kersbergen, Inge, et al.. (2023). Temporary abstinence challenges: What do we need to know?. Drug and Alcohol Review. 42(5). 1087–1091. 6 indexed citations
7.
Loebenberg, Gemma, Jamie Brown, Susan Michie, et al.. (2023). Bot or Not? Detecting and Managing Participant Deception When Conducting Digital Research Remotely: Case Study of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 25. e46523–e46523. 17 indexed citations
8.
Alava, Mónica Hernández, et al.. (2022). Strategies to cut down drinking, alcohol consumption, and usual drinking frequency: Evidence from a British online market research survey. Social Science & Medicine. 310. 115280–115280. 4 indexed citations
9.
Jackson, Sarah E., Emma Beard, Colin Angus, Matt Field, & Jamie Brown. (2021). Moderators of changes in smoking, drinking and quitting behaviour associated with the first COVID‐19 lockdown in England. Addiction. 117(3). 772–783. 66 indexed citations
10.
Buckley, Charlotte, Matt Field, Alan Brennan, et al.. (2021). An integrated dual process simulation model of alcohol use behaviours in individuals, with application to US population-level consumption, 1984–2012. Addictive Behaviors. 124. 107094–107094. 4 indexed citations
11.
Mahedy, Liam, Steph Suddell, Caroline Skirrow, et al.. (2020). Alcohol use and cognitive functioning in young adults: improving causal inference. Addiction. 116(2). 292–302. 13 indexed citations
12.
Field, Matt, Paul Christiansen, Charlotte A. Hardman, et al.. (2020). Translation of findings from laboratory studies of food and alcohol intake into behavior change interventions: The experimental medicine approach.. Health Psychology. 40(12). 951–959. 12 indexed citations
13.
Field, Matt & Inge Kersbergen. (2019). Are animal models of addiction useful?. Addiction. 115(1). 6–12. 34 indexed citations
14.
Puddephatt, Jo‐Anne, Daniel Leightley, Norman Jones, et al.. (2019). A Qualitative Evaluation of the Acceptability of a Tailored Smartphone Alcohol Intervention for a Military Population: Information About Drinking for Ex-Serving Personnel (InDEx) App. JMIR mhealth and uhealth. 7(5). e12267–e12267. 30 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Andrew, Elly McGrath, Eric Robinson, et al.. (2018). A randomized controlled trial of inhibitory control training for the reduction of alcohol consumption in problem drinkers.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 86(12). 991–1004. 40 indexed citations
16.
Jones, Andrew, Ilse Verveer, Eric Robinson, et al.. (2018). Compliance with ecological momentary assessment protocols in substance users: a meta‐analysis. Addiction. 114(4). 609–619. 187 indexed citations
17.
Kersbergen, Inge, Marcella L. Woud, & Matt Field. (2014). The validity of different measures of automatic alcohol action tendencies.. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 29(1). 225–230. 61 indexed citations
18.
Jones, Andrew & Matt Field. (2012). The effects of cue-specific inhibition training on alcohol consumption in heavy social drinkers.. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 21(1). 8–16. 85 indexed citations
19.
Field, Matt, Marcus R. Munafò, & Ingmar H. A. Franken. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between attentional bias and subjective craving in substance abuse.. Psychological Bulletin. 135(4). 589–607. 457 indexed citations
20.
Field, Matt, Karin Mogg, & Brendan P. Bradley. (2002). Nicotine deprivation and overt attentional orienting to smoking cues. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026