Fred Englander

20 papers receiving 541 citations

Peers

Fred Englander
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 245
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 131
  • Safety Research 71
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Rehabilitation 45
Replace Kim Parker with:
Kim Parker Canada
Per J. Palmgren Sweden
Malissa Martin United States
Katherine Beissner United States
Aamir Raoof Memon Australia
Hannah R. Marston United Kingdom
Nikolaos Vernadakıs Greece
Panagiotis Antonıou Greece
Susan Wainwright United States
Tracy L. Washington Australia
Fred Englander relative to Kim Parker Canada Kim Parker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
Kim Parker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fred Englander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fred Englander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred Englander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred Englander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fred Englander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred Englander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred Englander. The network helps show where Fred Englander may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Fred Englander, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fred Englander Line = papers co-authored together Fred Englander links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996344
2 201486
3 201041
4 201025
5 200718
6 199917
7 201113
8 201612
9
WHY LEARNING STYLES MATTER FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN COLLEGE ECONOMICS
20099
10 20207
11 20155
12 19855
13 20204
14 19953
15 19853
16 20022
17 19862
18 19842
19
The Impact of Learning Styles on Achievement in Principles of Microeconomics: A Natural Experiment.
20091
20 19841

About Fred Englander

Fred Englander is a scholar working on Safety Research, Gender Studies, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Economics and Econometrics and Computer Science Applications, having authored 22 papers that have together received 600 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Academic integrity and plagiarism (4 papers), Innovations in Educational Methods (4 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers), Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies (2 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (2 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers) and Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (245 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (131 citations), Safety Research (71 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations) and Rehabilitation (45 citations). Fred Englander has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Ralph A. Terregrossa, T. C. Hodson, Zhaobo Wang, Thomas Hodson and Mark I. Marpet. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Academic Ethics, Review of Policy Research, American Journal of Distance Education and Practical assessment, research & evaluation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026