Review of Policy Research

1.6k papers and 18.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Review of Policy Research in the last decades have received a total of 18.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Policy Research usually cover Political Science and International Relations (563 papers), Sociology and Political Science (463 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (396 papers) specifically the topics of Policy Transfer and Learning (237 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (183 papers) and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (102 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Policy Research are Barry G. Rabe, Charles Davis, Daniel C. Matisoff, Thomas C. Beierle, Arjen Boin, Sanya Carley, Michael Howlett, Thomas A. Birkland, Peter deLeon and B. Guy Peters.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Policy Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Policy Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Policy Research.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Policy Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Policy Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Policy Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Policy Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025