Franklin Acito

647 total citations
21 papers, 464 citations indexed

About

Franklin Acito is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Franklin Acito has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 464 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 5 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 4 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in Franklin Acito's work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (4 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (4 papers). Franklin Acito is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (4 papers) and Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (4 papers). Franklin Acito collaborates with scholars based in United States. Franklin Acito's co-authors include Arun K. Jain, Naresh K. Malhotra, Vijay Mahajan, Joseph A. Alutto, Ronald D. Anderson, Richard W. Olshavsky, Thomas P. Hustad, Jeffrey D. Ford, Jack L. Engledow and Donald H. Granbois and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Marketing Research and Journal of Consumer Research.

In The Last Decade

Franklin Acito

19 papers receiving 367 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Franklin Acito United States 12 228 202 134 77 49 21 464
W. Wayne Talarzyk United States 10 84 0.4× 330 1.6× 141 1.1× 45 0.6× 41 0.8× 31 530
Neil E. Beckwith United States 9 128 0.6× 275 1.4× 77 0.6× 73 0.9× 54 1.1× 15 459
Chem L. Narayana United States 10 71 0.3× 209 1.0× 85 0.6× 34 0.4× 29 0.6× 13 456
Timothy J. Gilbride United States 12 317 1.4× 493 2.4× 90 0.7× 94 1.2× 28 0.6× 18 749
K. Koelemeijer Netherlands 11 57 0.3× 262 1.3× 170 1.3× 33 0.4× 29 0.6× 22 522
Erjen van Nierop Netherlands 11 90 0.4× 231 1.1× 48 0.4× 37 0.5× 19 0.4× 24 388
Jeff D. Brazell United States 9 303 1.3× 220 1.1× 29 0.2× 43 0.6× 14 0.3× 18 455
W. Steven Perkins United States 7 25 0.1× 135 0.7× 145 1.1× 41 0.5× 48 1.0× 13 362
Darlene Brannigan Smith United States 7 42 0.2× 360 1.8× 92 0.7× 36 0.5× 28 0.6× 12 606
Ian Fenwick Canada 12 71 0.3× 106 0.5× 39 0.3× 53 0.7× 16 0.3× 31 349

Countries citing papers authored by Franklin Acito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Franklin Acito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Franklin Acito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Franklin Acito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Franklin Acito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Franklin Acito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Franklin Acito. The network helps show where Franklin Acito may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Franklin Acito

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Franklin Acito. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Franklin Acito based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Franklin Acito. Franklin Acito is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Granbois, Donald H., Dennis L. Rosen, & Franklin Acito. (1986). A Developmental Study of Family Financial Management Practices. ACR North American Advances. 5 indexed citations
2.
Acito, Franklin & Ronald D. Anderson. (1984). On Simulation Methods for Investigating Structural Modeling. Journal of Marketing Research. 21(1). 107–107. 1 indexed citations
3.
Acito, Franklin & Ronald D. Anderson. (1984). On Simulation Methods for Investigating Structural Modeling. Journal of Marketing Research. 21(1). 107–112. 2 indexed citations
4.
Anderson, Ronald D., Franklin Acito, & Hanjoon Lee. (1982). A Simulation Study Of Three Methods For Determining The Number Of Image Components. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 17(4). 493–502. 3 indexed citations
5.
Acito, Franklin & Richard W. Olshavsky. (1981). Limits to Accuracy in Conjoint Analysis. ACR North American Advances. 1 indexed citations
6.
Acito, Franklin & Thomas P. Hustad. (1981). Industrial product concept testing. Industrial Marketing Management. 10(3). 157–164. 23 indexed citations
7.
Acito, Franklin. (1980). Employee attitudes toward advertising. Journal of Business Research. 8(4). 525–540. 5 indexed citations
8.
Acito, Franklin, Ronald D. Anderson, & Jack L. Engledow. (1980). A Simulation Study of Methods for Hypothesis Testing in Factor Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research. 7(2). 141–141. 12 indexed citations
9.
Acito, Franklin & Ronald D. Anderson. (1980). A Monte Carlo Comparison of Factor Analytic Methods. Journal of Marketing Research. 17(2). 228–228. 11 indexed citations
10.
Acito, Franklin & Ronald D. Anderson. (1980). A Simulation Study Of The Robustness Of Orthogonal Target Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 15(3). 319–334. 3 indexed citations
11.
Acito, Franklin & Arun K. Jain. (1980). Evaluation of Conjoint Analysis Results: A Comparison of Methods. Journal of Marketing Research. 17(1). 106–112. 49 indexed citations
12.
Acito, Franklin & Ronald D. Anderson. (1980). A Monté Carlo Comparison of Factor Analytic Methods. Journal of Marketing Research. 17(2). 228–236. 23 indexed citations
13.
Olshavsky, Richard W. & Franklin Acito. (1980). AN INFORMATION PROCESSING PROBE INTO CONJOINT ANALYSIS*. Decision Sciences. 11(3). 451–470. 24 indexed citations
14.
Acito, Franklin & Arun K. Jain. (1980). Evaluation of Conjoint Analysis Results: A Comparison of Methods. Journal of Marketing Research. 17(1). 106–106. 20 indexed citations
15.
Jain, Arun K., Franklin Acito, Naresh K. Malhotra, & Vijay Mahajan. (1979). A Comparison of the Internal Validity of Alternative Parameter Estimation Methods in Decompositional Multiattribute Preference Models. Journal of Marketing Research. 16(3). 313–322. 125 indexed citations
16.
Jain, Arun K., Franklin Acito, Naresh K. Malhotra, & Vijay Mahajan. (1979). A Comparison of the Internal Validity of Alternative Parameter Estimation Methods in Decompositional Multiattribute Preference Models. Journal of Marketing Research. 16(3). 313–313. 47 indexed citations
17.
Acito, Franklin. (1978). Consumer Decision Making and Health Maintenance Organizations: A Review. Medical Care. 16(1). 1–13. 14 indexed citations
18.
Acito, Franklin. (1976). Consumer preferences for health care services : an exploratory investigation. Xerox University Microfilms eBooks. 2 indexed citations
19.
Alutto, Joseph A. & Franklin Acito. (1974). Decisional Participation and Sources of Job Satisfaction: A Study of Manufacturing Personnel. Academy of Management Journal. 17(1). 160–167. 2 indexed citations
20.
Alutto, Joseph A. & Franklin Acito. (1974). DECISIONAL PARTICIPATION AND SOURCES OF JOB SATISFACTION: A STUDY OF MANUFACTURING PERSONNEL.. Academy of Management Journal. 17(1). 160–167. 69 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026