Frances A. O’Brien

32 papers receiving 799 citations

Peers

Frances A. O’Brien
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Management Science and Operations Research 404
  • Strategy and Management 264
  • Management Information Systems 139
  • Artificial Intelligence 128
  • Sociology and Political Science 100
Replace John P. van Gigch with:
John P. van Gigch United States
Richard Ormerod United Kingdom
Maurice Landry Canada
Simon Peck United Kingdom
David Hillson United States
John Brocklesby New Zealand
Caroline Maria de Miranda Mota Brazil
Andreas Größler Germany
Paulo Gonçalves Switzerland
Ido Millet United States
Frances A. O’Brien relative to John P. van Gigch United States John P. van Gigch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
John P. van Gigch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frances A. O’Brien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frances A. O’Brien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frances A. O’Brien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frances A. O’Brien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frances A. O’Brien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frances A. O’Brien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frances A. O’Brien. The network helps show where Frances A. O’Brien may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frances A. O’Brien

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frances A. O’Brien. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frances A. O’Brien based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frances A. O’Brien. Frances A. O’Brien is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 2
2 15
3 10
4 49
5 7
6 47
7 13
8 1
9 90
10 12
11 9
12 34
13 9
14
Supporting strategy : a survey of UK OR/MS practitioners
2
15
Supporting strategy : frameworks, methods and models
81
16 26
17 13
18 112
19 10
20 3

About Frances A. O’Brien

Frances A. O’Brien is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management and General Decision Sciences, having authored 32 papers that have together received 838 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (18 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (6 papers) and Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (404 citations), Strategy and Management (264 citations) and Management Information Systems (139 citations). Frances A. O’Brien has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Chile. Frequent co-authors include Maureen Meadows, Martin Kunc, Robert G. Dyson, Juan Pablo Torres, John Mingers, Mandie Foster, George Wright, Paul Goodwin, George Cairns and Christine Currie. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Operations Research and Journal of the Operational Research Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026