John Brocklesby

1.5k total citations
32 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

John Brocklesby is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, John Brocklesby has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 12 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in John Brocklesby's work include Complex Systems and Decision Making (24 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (12 papers) and Information Systems Theories and Implementation (10 papers). John Brocklesby is often cited by papers focused on Complex Systems and Decision Making (24 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (12 papers) and Information Systems Theories and Implementation (10 papers). John Brocklesby collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Australia. John Brocklesby's co-authors include John Mingers, Stephen Cummings, Gerald Midgley, Annabel Ahuriri‐Driscoll, Robert Y. Cavana, Jeff Foote, D.R. Wood, J. H. Bamber, Colin Campbell‐Hunt and Arun Elias and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Journal of the Operational Research Society and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

In The Last Decade

John Brocklesby

30 papers receiving 957 citations

Peers

John Brocklesby

MSOR

SPS

AI

SM

OBHRM

P. Keys United Kingdom

Richard Ormerod United Kingdom

Ángela Espinosa United Kingdom

Frederick P. Wheeler United Kingdom

M. Elizabeth Boone Canada

Linda Booth Sweeney United States

Frances A. O’Brien United Kingdom

Rafikul Islam Malaysia

Nigel Howard Canada

Kurt A. Richardson United States

P. Keys United Kingdom

John Brocklesby

684 ×1.0

MSOR

293 ×1.0

SPS

316 ×1.1

AI

83 ×0.6

SM

109 ×0.8

OBHRM

Citations per year, relative to John Brocklesby John Brocklesby (= 1×) peers P. Keys

Countries citing papers authored by John Brocklesby

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Brocklesby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Brocklesby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Brocklesby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Brocklesby

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Brocklesby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Brocklesby. The network helps show where John Brocklesby may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Brocklesby

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Brocklesby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Brocklesby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Brocklesby. John Brocklesby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Brocklesby, John, et al.. (2024). Enhancing collaborative advantage through critical systems thinking: An augmented viable system model intervention in a cross‐sector partnership social policy context. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 42(1). 142–156. 1 indexed citations

2.

Brocklesby, John. (2023). Mixing Methods in Systems Practice. 3(1). 1 indexed citations

3.

Brocklesby, John, et al.. (2015). Boundary games: How teams of OR practitioners explore the boundaries of intervention. European Journal of Operational Research. 249(3). 968–982. 37 indexed citations

4.

Brocklesby, John. (2015). The what, the why and the how of behavioural operational research—An invitation to potential sceptics. European Journal of Operational Research. 249(3). 796–805. 44 indexed citations

5.

Midgley, Gerald, Robert Y. Cavana, John Brocklesby, et al.. (2013). Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods. European Journal of Operational Research. 229(1). 143–154. 117 indexed citations

6.

Brocklesby, John, et al.. (2006). Audit of the influence of body mass index on the performance of epidural analgesia in labour and the subsequent mode of delivery. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 113(10). 1178–1181. 52 indexed citations

7.

Cummings, Stephen & John Brocklesby. (1997). Towardsdemokratia‐ myth and the management of organizational change in ancient Athens. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 10(1). 71–95. 3 indexed citations

8.

Brocklesby, John & Stephen Cummings. (1996). Designing a viable organization structure. Long Range Planning. 29(1). 49–57. 56 indexed citations

9.

Brocklesby, John & Stephen Cummings. (1996). Foucault Plays Habermas: An Alternative Philosophical Underpinning for Critical Systems Thinking. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 47(6). 741–754. 1 indexed citations

10.

Brocklesby, John & Stephen Cummings. (1996). Foucault Plays Habermas: An Alternative Philosophical Underpinning for Critical Systems Thinking. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 47(6). 741–741.

11.

Brocklesby, John & Stephen Cummings. (1996). Foucault Plays Habermas: An Alternative Philosophical Underpinning for Critical Systems Thinking. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 47(6). 741–754. 62 indexed citations

12.

Brocklesby, John. (1996). New Methods for Old: On the Take-Up of Methodological Complementarism. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 47(10). 1318–1322. 2 indexed citations

13.

Brocklesby, John. (1995). Intervening in the Cultural Constitution of Systems—Methodological Complementarism and other Visions for Systems Research. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 46(11). 1285–1298. 27 indexed citations

14.

Brocklesby, John & Stephen Cummings. (1995). Combining hard, soft, and critical methodologies in systems research: The cultural constraints. Systems Research. 12(3). 239–245. 14 indexed citations

15.

Brocklesby, John. (1995). Intervening in the Cultural Constitution of Systems-Methodological Complementarism and Other Visions for Systems Research. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 46(11). 1285–1285. 1 indexed citations

16.

Brocklesby, John. (1995). Intervening in the Cultural Constitution of Systems — Methodological Complementarism and other Visions for Systems Research. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 46(11). 1285–1298. 2 indexed citations

17.

Brocklesby, John. (1995). Using soft systems methodology to identify competence requirementsin HRM. International Journal of Manpower. 16(5/6). 70–84. 27 indexed citations

18.

Brocklesby, John. (1994). Let the jury decide: Assessing the cultural feasibility of total systems intervention. Systemic Practice and Action Research. 7(1). 75–86. 19 indexed citations

19.

Cummings, Stephen & John Brocklesby. (1993). The classical system-organizational insights into what made Periclean Athens great. 6(4). 335–357. 5 indexed citations

20.

Brocklesby, John. (1970). REVIEW ARTICLE: Industrial Relations and the Capitalist Labour Process. New Zealand Journal of Industrial Relations. 8(3). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact