George Wright

12.5k total citations · 3 hit papers
144 papers, 7.9k citations indexed

About

George Wright is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, General Decision Sciences and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, George Wright has authored 144 papers receiving a total of 7.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 63 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 41 papers in General Decision Sciences and 33 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in George Wright's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (41 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (33 papers) and Forecasting Techniques and Applications (27 papers). George Wright is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (41 papers), Complex Systems and Decision Making (33 papers) and Forecasting Techniques and Applications (27 papers). George Wright collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. George Wright's co-authors include Gene Rowe, George Cairns, Fergus Bolger, Paul Goodwin, Ron Bradfield, Ferdinand van der Heijden, George Burt, Peter Ayton, Gerard P. Hodgkinson and James Derbyshire and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Strategic Management Journal and Management Science.

In The Last Decade

George Wright

138 papers receiving 7.3k citations

Hit Papers

The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and an... 1999 2026 2008 2017 1999 2005 2019 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
George Wright United Kingdom 41 2.5k 2.2k 1.1k 877 836 144 7.9k
Detlof von Winterfeldt United States 34 2.8k 1.1× 2.0k 0.9× 840 0.8× 1.5k 1.7× 1.0k 1.2× 106 9.9k
Ralph L. Keeney United States 51 1.9k 0.8× 3.9k 1.8× 991 0.9× 2.7k 3.0× 1.3k 1.5× 164 12.1k
Scott E. Page United States 31 2.2k 0.9× 1.1k 0.5× 675 0.6× 1.3k 1.5× 163 0.2× 115 7.7k
Howard Raiffa United States 34 2.1k 0.8× 4.1k 1.8× 941 0.9× 3.1k 3.5× 1.5k 1.8× 70 13.9k
David V. Budescu United States 54 2.6k 1.0× 2.9k 1.3× 316 0.3× 2.0k 2.3× 3.5k 4.2× 201 11.6k
Gary Klein United States 34 1.4k 0.6× 1.9k 0.8× 625 0.6× 499 0.6× 1.2k 1.4× 146 11.5k
Paul E. Green United States 48 944 0.4× 1.1k 0.5× 770 0.7× 2.6k 3.0× 497 0.6× 207 9.4k
Terje Aven Norway 63 2.6k 1.0× 1.4k 0.6× 1.5k 1.3× 659 0.8× 96 0.1× 346 12.9k
David W. Stewart United States 47 4.1k 1.6× 538 0.2× 1.3k 1.2× 927 1.1× 226 0.3× 213 13.4k
Harold A. Linstone United States 35 2.9k 1.1× 2.1k 0.9× 1.4k 1.3× 1.2k 1.4× 64 0.1× 157 10.9k

Countries citing papers authored by George Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Wright. The network helps show where George Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Wright. George Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wright, George, et al.. (2025). Automatic discovery of robust risk groups from limited survival data across biomedical modalities. Machine Learning with Applications. 23. 100814–100814.
2.
Goodwin, Paul & George Wright. (2025). Can Narrative‐Based Scenarios Support Quantitative Judgmental Forecasting?. Pure (University of Bath). 7(1).
3.
Bolger, Fergus, et al.. (2023). Virtuous opinion change in structured groups. Judgment and Decision Making. 18. 2 indexed citations
4.
Bolger, Fergus, Ian Belton, Iain Hamlin, et al.. (2020). Improving the production and evaluation of structural models using a Delphi process. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
5.
Wright, George, et al.. (2013). Scenario methodology: New developments in theory and practice: Introduction to the Special Issue. QUT Business School. 5 indexed citations
6.
Wright, George, et al.. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 5 indexed citations
7.
Cairns, George, et al.. (2004). Exploring e-government futures through the application of scenario planning. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde). 1 indexed citations
8.
Wright, George, et al.. (2002). The Difficulties of Learning Object-Oriented Analysis and Design: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 42(2). 95–100. 16 indexed citations
9.
Wright, George, Fergus Bolger, & Gene Rowe. (2002). An Empirical Test of the Relative Validity of Expert and Lay Judgments of Risk. Risk Analysis. 22(6). 1107–1122. 53 indexed citations
10.
Burt, George, George Cairns, Ferdinand van der Heijden, & George Wright. (2001). The application of scenario planning to internally generated e-government futures. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 3 indexed citations
11.
Rowe, Gene & George Wright. (2001). Differences in Expert and Lay Judgments of Risk: Myth or Reality?. Risk Analysis. 21(2). 341–356. 191 indexed citations
12.
Wright, George & Paul Goodwin. (1999). Rethinking value elicitation for personal consequential decisions. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. 8(1). 3–10. 24 indexed citations
13.
Fletcher, Keith & George Wright. (1996). The strategic context for information systems use: An empirical study of the financial services industry. International Journal of Information Management. 16(2). 119–131. 22 indexed citations
14.
Ciarrocchi, Giovanni, et al.. (1993). Bacteriophage T4 and human type I DNA ligases relax DNA under joining conditions. Nucleic Acids Research. 21(25). 5934–5939. 13 indexed citations
15.
Rowe, Gene, George Wright, & Fergus Bolger. (1991). The Delphi Technique: A Re-Evaluation of Research and Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal. 29 indexed citations
16.
Wright, George. (1987). Rehabilitation Skills Inventory: Importance of Counselor Competencies.. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 31(2). 9 indexed citations
17.
Wright, George & Deborah J. Ebener. (1987). Demographics of Rehabilitation Educators and Their University Programs.. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 31(2). 1 indexed citations
18.
Wright, George, et al.. (1987). Rehabilitation Job Satisfaction Inventory.. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 31(2). 6 indexed citations
19.
Wright, George, et al.. (1980). Vocational rehabilitation of Blacks. The statement.. Journal of rehabilitation. 46(2). 40–49. 5 indexed citations
20.
Wright, George & Lawrence D. Phillips. (1979). Cross-Cultural Differences in the Assessment and Communication of Uncertainty. Current Anthropology. 20(4). 845–846. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026