Ido Millet

946 total citations
23 papers, 677 citations indexed

About

Ido Millet is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Ido Millet has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 677 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 6 papers in Management Information Systems and 3 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Ido Millet's work include Multi-Criteria Decision Making (7 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (2 papers). Ido Millet is often cited by papers focused on Multi-Criteria Decision Making (7 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (2 papers) and Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (2 papers). Ido Millet collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Ido Millet's co-authors include Thomas L. Saaty, William C. Wedley, Patrick T. Harker, Diane H. Parente, John L. Fizel, Ray R. Venkataraman, Bertram Schoner, Syed Saad Andaleeb, Jeffrey K. Pinto and Robert J. Nelson and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Journal of Business Ethics and Journal of the Operational Research Society.

In The Last Decade

Ido Millet

22 papers receiving 601 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ido Millet United States	12	359	126	124	71	64	23	677
Chien‐Chang Chou Taiwan	17	379 1.1×	91 0.7×	84 0.7×	67 0.9×	80 1.3×	51	1.1k
Mohammad Hasan Aghdaie Iran	10	471 1.3×	195 1.5×	88 0.7×	49 0.7×	98 1.5×	15	777
Changyuan Gao China	13	266 0.7×	122 1.0×	125 1.0×	111 1.6×	87 1.4×	36	774
Nilsen Karakaşoğlu Türkiye	5	513 1.4×	158 1.3×	89 0.7×	56 0.8×	132 2.1×	7	782
Luciano Ferreira Brazil	14	309 0.9×	89 0.7×	74 0.6×	69 1.0×	100 1.6×	31	651
How‐Ming Shieh Taiwan	9	324 0.9×	220 1.7×	140 1.1×	87 1.2×	31 0.5×	10	818
Sandipa Dublish United States	4	430 1.2×	104 0.8×	47 0.4×	94 1.3×	136 2.1×	6	882
Frederick P. Wheeler United Kingdom	7	327 0.9×	75 0.6×	112 0.9×	107 1.5×	76 1.2×	11	674
James L. Corner New Zealand	13	340 0.9×	131 1.0×	72 0.6×	146 2.1×	75 1.2×	34	781
Caroline Maria de Miranda Mota Brazil	19	493 1.4×	272 2.2×	165 1.3×	55 0.8×	74 1.2×	70	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Ido Millet

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ido Millet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ido Millet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ido Millet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ido Millet

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ido Millet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ido Millet. The network helps show where Ido Millet may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ido Millet

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ido Millet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ido Millet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ido Millet. Ido Millet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Millet, Ido. (2020). Improving Grading Consistency through Grade Lift Reporting. Practical assessment, research & evaluation. 15(4). 4. 1 indexed citations

2.

Millet, Ido. (2016). The relationship between grading leniency and grading reliability. Studies in Higher Education. 43(9). 1524–1535. 3 indexed citations

3.

Andaleeb, Syed Saad & Ido Millet. (2010). Service experiences in hospitals in Bangladesh: are there gender inequities?. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance. 23(6). 591–606. 21 indexed citations

4.

Millet, Ido & Robert H. Nelson. (2007). Data Flow Diagrams vs. Use Cases – Student Perceptions. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education. 3(1). 70–78. 2 indexed citations

5.

Millet, Ido & Janis L. Gogan. (2005). A dialectical framework for problem structuring and information technology. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 57(4). 434–442. 2 indexed citations

6.

Nelson, Robert & Ido Millet. (2004). Data Flow Diagrams versus Use Cases - Student Reactions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 348. 2 indexed citations

7.

Millet, Ido & Bertram Schoner. (2004). Incorporating negative values into the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Computers & Operations Research. 32(12). 3163–3173. 27 indexed citations

8.

Millet, Ido, Diane H. Parente, John L. Fizel, & Ray R. Venkataraman. (2004). Metrics for Managing Online Procurement Auctions. INFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics. 34(3). 171–179. 48 indexed citations

9.

Parente, Diane H., Ray R. Venkataraman, John L. Fizel, & Ido Millet. (2004). A conceptual research framework for analyzing online auctions in a B2B environment. Supply Chain Management An International Journal. 9(4). 287–294. 21 indexed citations

10.

Millet, Ido & William C. Wedley. (2002). Modelling risk and uncertainty with the analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. 11(2). 97–107. 107 indexed citations

11.

Millet, Ido, et al.. (2002). EIS versus MIS: a choice perspective. iii. 202–209.

12.

Nelson, Robert J. & Ido Millet. (2001). A Foundation Course in ERP and Business Processes: Rationale, Design, and Educational Outcomes. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 11 indexed citations

13.

Millet, Ido & Thomas L. Saaty. (2000). On the relativity of relative measures – accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research. 121(1). 205–212. 138 indexed citations

14.

Millet, Ido. (1999). Technical note—A proposal to simplify data flow diagrams. IBM Systems Journal. 38(1). 118–121. 7 indexed citations

15.

Pinto, Jeffrey K. & Ido Millet. (1999). Successful Information System Implementation: The Human Side. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 16 indexed citations

16.

Millet, Ido. (1998). Ethical Decision Making Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Business Ethics. 17(11). 1197–1204. 37 indexed citations

17.

Millet, Ido. (1997). The Effectiveness of Alternative Preference Elicitation Methods in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. 6(1). 41–51. 98 indexed citations

18.

Millet, Ido. (1997). The Effectiveness of Alternative Preference Elicitation Methods in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis. 6(1). 41–51. 5 indexed citations

19.

Millet, Ido, et al.. (1992). Executive information systems. Information & Management. 23(2). 83–92. 35 indexed citations

20.

Millet, Ido & Patrick T. Harker. (1990). Globally effective questioning in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research. 48(1). 88–97. 75 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact