Fokie Cnossen

2.4k citations
58 papers · 1.5k indexed · h-index 17

Fokie Cnossen

56 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Fokie Cnossen
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Human-Computer Interaction 167
  • Social Psychology 508
  • Health Informatics 29
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 183
  • Applied Psychology 68
Replace Richard Pak with:
Richard Pak United States
Jenay M. Beer United States
Laurel D. Riek United States
Tracy L. Mitzner United States
Mark W. Scerbo United States
Hyun K. Kim South Korea
Alex Kirlik United States
Vincent G. Duffy United States
Beth Crandall United States
Casey C. Bennett United States
Fokie Cnossen relative to Richard Pak United States Richard Pak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Richard Pak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fokie Cnossen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fokie Cnossen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fokie Cnossen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fokie Cnossen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fokie Cnossen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fokie Cnossen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fokie Cnossen. The network helps show where Fokie Cnossen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fokie Cnossen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fokie Cnossen Line = papers co-authored together Fokie Cnossen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20245
2 20243
3 202313
4 20220
5 20211
6 202153
7 20212
8 202048
9 20206
10 20202
11 202014
12 20199
13 20191
14 20178
15 201443
16 20135
17 201321
18
IMPROVING COLLABORATION FOR CHILDREN WITH PDD-NOS THROUGH A MULTI-TOUCH BASED SERIOUS GAME
20095
19
Improving Situation Awareness in Anesthesiology
20050
20 199313

About Fokie Cnossen

Fokie Cnossen is a scholar working on Family Practice, Health Informatics and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (5 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (5 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (4 papers), Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (4 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (167 citations), Social Psychology (508 citations) and Health Informatics (29 citations). Fokie Cnossen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rosemarijn Looije, Mark A. Neerincx, Niels Taatgen, Francisco R. Ortega, Armando Barreto, Tessa Verhoef, Christine Lisetti, Peter M. A. van Ooijen, Theo F. Meijman and Wiard Jorritsma. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of surgical education, International Journal of Medical Informatics, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Medical Education and British journal of surgery.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026