Richard Pak

3.2k total citations · 2 hit papers
89 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Richard Pak is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Richard Pak has authored 89 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 48 papers in Social Psychology, 21 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 20 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Richard Pak's work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (38 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (18 papers) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (15 papers). Richard Pak is often cited by papers focused on Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (38 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (18 papers) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (15 papers). Richard Pak collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Romania. Richard Pak's co-authors include Ewart J. de Visser, Tyler H. Shaw, Anne Collins McLaughlin, Margaux M. Price, Wendy A. Rogers, Spencer Kohn, Arthur D. Fisk, Ericka Rovira, Mark A. Neerincx and Malte Jung and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Journal of Experimental Psychology General and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Richard Pak

83 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teams

2019 247 citations Ewart J. de Visser, Marieke Peeters et al. International Journal of Social Robotics profile →
From ‘automation’ to ‘autonomy’: the importance of trust repair in human–machine interaction

2018 224 citations Ewart J. de Visser, Richard Pak et al. Ergonomics profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Richard Pak United States	23	938	350	323	309	299	89	2.0k
Joseph F. Coughlin United States	38	1.9k 2.0×	258 0.7×	468 1.4×	96 0.3×	558 1.9×	181	4.8k
Michael D. Coovert United States	29	824 0.9×	232 0.7×	273 0.8×	59 0.2×	262 0.9×	92	3.1k
James L. Szalma United States	25	1.6k 1.7×	261 0.7×	746 2.3×	218 0.7×	458 1.5×	127	3.0k
Joseph B. Lyons United States	29	1.4k 1.5×	359 1.0×	146 0.5×	361 1.2×	201 0.7×	92	2.4k
Marc T. P. Adam Australia	24	270 0.3×	264 0.8×	226 0.7×	170 0.6×	230 0.8×	116	1.9k
Gale Lucas United States	29	1.8k 1.9×	748 2.1×	316 1.0×	222 0.7×	746 2.5×	122	4.0k
Jenay M. Beer United States	21	827 0.9×	527 1.5×	193 0.6×	81 0.3×	80 0.3×	75	1.7k
Annette Kluge Germany	21	819 0.9×	162 0.5×	127 0.4×	47 0.2×	190 0.6×	144	2.1k
Mark A. Neerincx Netherlands	32	1.7k 1.9×	1.4k 4.0×	622 1.9×	336 1.1×	844 2.8×	243	4.4k
David Coyle Ireland	33	732 0.8×	351 1.0×	450 1.4×	85 0.3×	527 1.8×	105	3.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Pak

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Pak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Pak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Pak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Pak

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Pak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Pak. The network helps show where Richard Pak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Pak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Pak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Pak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Pak. Richard Pak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Pak, Richard, Ericka Rovira, & Anne Collins McLaughlin. (2024). Polite AI mitigates user susceptibility to AI hallucinations. Ergonomics. 68(10). 1735–1745. 2 indexed citations

Burgoyne, Alexander P., Cody A. Mashburn, Jason S. Tsukahara, et al.. (2024). Attention Control Measures Improve the Prediction of Performance in Navy Trainees. International Journal of Selection and Assessment. 33(1).

Mashburn, Cody A., Alexander P. Burgoyne, Jason S. Tsukahara, et al.. (2024). Knowledge, attention, and psychomotor ability: A latent variable approach to understanding individual differences in simulated work performance. Intelligence. 104. 101835–101835. 1 indexed citations

Pak, Richard, Anne Collins McLaughlin, & Randall W. Engle. (2023). The Relevance of Attention Control, Not Working Memory, in Human Factors. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 66(5). 1321–1332. 8 indexed citations

Schelble, Beau G., et al.. (2023). The complex relationship of AI ethics and trust in human–AI teaming: insights from advanced real-world subject matter experts. AI and Ethics. 4(4). 1213–1233. 5 indexed citations

Schelble, Beau G., et al.. (2022). Investigating the Effects of Perceived Teammate Artificiality on Human Performance and Cognition. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. 39(13). 2686–2701. 16 indexed citations

Schelble, Beau G., et al.. (2022). Towards Ethical AI: Empirically Investigating Dimensions of AI Ethics, Trust Repair, and Performance in Human-AI Teaming. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 66(4). 1037–1055. 45 indexed citations

Zhang, Rui, Beau G. Schelble, Nathan J. McNeese, et al.. (2022). Exploring the Relationship Between Ethics and Trust in Human–Artificial Intelligence Teaming: A Mixed Methods Approach. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 16(4). 252–281. 39 indexed citations

Draheim, Christopher, Richard Pak, Amanda A. Draheim, & Randall W Engle. (2022). The role of attention control in complex real-world tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 29(4). 1143–1197. 54 indexed citations

10.

Foroughi, Cyrus K., et al.. (2021). Near-Perfect Automation: Investigating Performance, Trust, and Visual Attention Allocation. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 65(4). 546–561. 18 indexed citations

11.

Visser, Ewart J. de, Marieke Peeters, Malte Jung, et al.. (2019). Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teams. International Journal of Social Robotics. 12(2). 459–478. 247 indexed citations breakdown →

12.

Rovira, Ericka, Richard Pak, & Anne Collins McLaughlin. (2016). Effects of individual differences in working memory on performance and trust with various degrees of automation. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 18(6). 573–591. 29 indexed citations

13.

Pak, Richard, et al.. (2016). Does the domain of technology impact user trust? Investigating trust in automation across different consumer-oriented domains in young adults, military, and older adults. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 18(3). 199–220. 29 indexed citations

14.

Featherman, Mauricio, Ryan Wright, Jason Bennett Thatcher, J. Christopher Zimmer, & Richard Pak. (2011). The Influence of Interactivity on E-service Offerings: An Empirical Examination of Benefits and Risks. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction. 3(1). 1–25. 17 indexed citations

15.

Pak, Richard, et al.. (2010). Developing a Usability Evaluation Tool to Assess the Patient Room Bathroom. HERD Health Environments Research & Design Journal. 3(3). 22–41. 9 indexed citations

16.

Pak, Richard & Anne Collins McLaughlin. (2010). Designing Displays for Older Adults. 51 indexed citations

17.

Battisto, Dina, et al.. (2009). Using a Task Analysis to Describe Nursing Work in Acute Care Patient Environments. JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration. 39(12). 537–547. 40 indexed citations

18.

Pak, Richard, et al.. (2009). Prospective Memory in the Nursing Environment: Effects of Type of Prospective Task and Prospective Load. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 53(22). 1669–1673. 2 indexed citations

19.

Pak, Richard. (2001). A Further Examination of the Influence of Spatial Abilities on Computer Task Performance in Younger and Older Adults. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 45(22). 1551–1555. 22 indexed citations

20.

Blanchard–Fields, Fredda, et al.. (2001). Beyond a stereotyped view of older adults' traditional family values.. Psychology and Aging. 16(3). 483–496. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact