Richard Pak

3.2k citations
89 papers · 2.0k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 23

Richard Pak

83 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Hum...247201820262020202350100150200

Peers

Richard Pak
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Social Psychology 938
  • Health Informatics 54
  • Safety Research 309
  • Human-Computer Interaction 191
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 46
Replace Gale Lucas with:
Gale Lucas United States
Joseph F. Coughlin United States
Marcel Heerink Netherlands
Mark A. Neerincx Netherlands
David Coyle Ireland
Jenay M. Beer United States
Annette Kluge Germany
Laurel D. Riek United States
Dorian Peters Australia
Somaya Ben Allouch Netherlands
Richard Pak relative to Gale Lucas United States Gale Lucas's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Gale Lucas · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Richard Pak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Pak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Pak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Pak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Pak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Pak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Pak. The network helps show where Richard Pak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard Pak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Richard Pak Line = papers co-authored together Richard Pak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20241
3 20242
4 20235
5 20238
6 202239
7 202216
8 202245
9 202254
10 202118
11
Towards a Theory of Longitudinal Trust Calibration in Human–Robot Teamsbreakdown →
2019247
12 201936
13 20179
14 201629
15 201445
16 201228
17 20109
18 200940
19 200827
20 200122

About Richard Pak

Richard Pak is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 89 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (38 papers), Technology Use by Older Adults (18 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (15 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (12 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (10 papers), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (9 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (6 papers) and Spatial Cognition and Navigation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (938 citations), Health Informatics (54 citations) and Safety Research (309 citations). Richard Pak has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Ewart J. de Visser, Tyler H. Shaw, Anne Collins McLaughlin, Margaux M. Price, Wendy A. Rogers, Arthur D. Fisk, Spencer Kohn, Ericka Rovira, Mark A. Neerincx and Malte Jung. Their work appears in journals such as Ergonomics, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, Neuropsychology and Psychology and Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026