Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Food Science top 1%
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Biotechnology top 1%
- Microbiology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Romain BriandetArnaud BridierVincent ThomasJean-Yves LeveauB. HeydJean-Luc TholozanLaurent GuillierMurielle Naïtali
- Topics
- Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (20 papers)Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (17 papers)Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (13 papers)
In The Last Decade
Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet
40 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Molecular Biology 1.2k
- Food Science 672
- Organic Chemistry 455
- Biotechnology 383
- Microbiology 239
Countries citing papers authored by Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet
This map shows the geographic impact of Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet. The network helps show where Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet. Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 73 | |
| 8 | 52 | |
| 9 | 87 | |
| 10 | 86 | |
| 11 | 54 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | Resistance of bacterial biofilms to disinfectants: a reviewbreakdown → | 676 |
| 14 | 42 | |
| 15 | 189 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 49 |
About Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet
Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Endocrinology and Food Science, having authored 41 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (20 papers), Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety (17 papers) and Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (234 citations), Biotechnology (383 citations) and Microbiology (239 citations). Florence Dubois‐Brissonnet has collaborated with scholars based in France, Morocco and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Romain Briandet, Arnaud Bridier, Vincent Thomas, Jean-Yves Leveau, B. Heyd, Jean-Luc Tholozan, Laurent Guillier, Murielle Naïtali, Gilbert Greub and Dominique Le Coq. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.