Federica Barbieri

1.2k total citations
13 papers, 547 citations indexed

About

Federica Barbieri is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Federica Barbieri has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 547 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 8 papers in Language and Linguistics and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Federica Barbieri's work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (9 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (4 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 papers). Federica Barbieri is often cited by papers focused on Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (9 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (4 papers) and Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 papers). Federica Barbieri collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Federica Barbieri's co-authors include Douglas Biber, Mark C. James, Riccardo Ricotta and Marina Vitale and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied Linguistics, Studies in Second Language Acquisition and Journal of Pragmatics.

In The Last Decade

Federica Barbieri

12 papers receiving 466 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Federica Barbieri United States 8 322 310 256 144 87 13 547
Don R. McCreary United States 8 409 1.3× 260 0.8× 228 0.9× 143 1.0× 78 0.9× 29 552
Béatrice Dupuy United States 10 321 1.0× 252 0.8× 228 0.9× 56 0.4× 67 0.8× 18 503
Martin Hewings United Kingdom 12 200 0.6× 227 0.7× 99 0.4× 58 0.4× 54 0.6× 33 380
Thomas E. Nunnally United States 5 252 0.8× 150 0.5× 76 0.3× 184 1.3× 152 1.7× 11 489
Dana Gablasová United Kingdom 10 363 1.1× 208 0.7× 414 1.6× 301 2.1× 34 0.4× 20 673
Ivor Timmis United Kingdom 9 447 1.4× 311 1.0× 149 0.6× 55 0.4× 229 2.6× 20 600
April Ginther United States 11 367 1.1× 280 0.9× 314 1.2× 131 0.9× 52 0.6× 24 641
Khalid Al-Seghayer Saudi Arabia 9 448 1.4× 224 0.7× 302 1.2× 54 0.4× 92 1.1× 26 690
Joel Walz United States 13 409 1.3× 264 0.9× 181 0.7× 51 0.4× 196 2.3× 35 603
Elsa Tragant Spain 16 454 1.4× 311 1.0× 236 0.9× 34 0.2× 125 1.4× 35 640

Countries citing papers authored by Federica Barbieri

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Federica Barbieri's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federica Barbieri with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federica Barbieri more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Federica Barbieri

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federica Barbieri. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federica Barbieri. The network helps show where Federica Barbieri may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Federica Barbieri

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Federica Barbieri. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Federica Barbieri based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Federica Barbieri. Federica Barbieri is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Vitale, Marina, et al.. (2017). [Epidemiological study of dental and facial asymmetries in a sample of preschool subjects].. PubMed. 39(1). 45–51. 2 indexed citations
2.
Barbieri, Federica. (2016). Quotatives. New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Journal of Pragmatics. 98. 61–64.
3.
Barbieri, Federica. (2013). Involvement in University Classroom Discourse: Register Variation and Interactivity. Applied Linguistics. 36(2). 151–173. 15 indexed citations
4.
5.
Barbieri, Federica. (2009). Quotative be like in American English. English World-Wide A Journal of Varieties of English. 30(1). 68–90. 19 indexed citations
6.
Barbieri, Federica. (2008). Involvement in university classroom discourse. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 3 indexed citations
7.
Barbieri, Federica. (2008). Patterns of age‐based linguistic variation in American English1. Journal of Sociolinguistics. 12(1). 58–88. 49 indexed citations
8.
James, Mark C., et al.. (2008). What Are They Talking About? Lessons Learned from a Study of Peer Instruction. Astronomy Education Review. 7(1). 37–43. 18 indexed citations
9.
Barbieri, Federica. (2007). Older men and younger women. English World-Wide A Journal of Varieties of English. 28(1). 23–45. 21 indexed citations
10.
Biber, Douglas & Federica Barbieri. (2007). Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes. 26(3). 263–286. 342 indexed citations
11.
Barbieri, Federica, et al.. (2007). Applying corpus-based findings to form-focused instruction: The case of reported speech. Language Teaching Research. 11(3). 319–346. 41 indexed citations
12.
Barbieri, Federica. (2005). Quotative Use in American English. Journal of English Linguistics. 33(3). 222–256. 35 indexed citations
13.
Barbieri, Federica. (2001). The Contribution of Computer Learner Corpora to Second Language Acqusition Research: a Review. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 33(2). 1000–1022. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026