Douglas Biber

51.6k total citations · 14 hit papers
179 papers, 21.0k citations indexed

About

Douglas Biber is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Douglas Biber has authored 179 papers receiving a total of 21.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 82 papers in Language and Linguistics, 71 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 66 papers in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Douglas Biber's work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (61 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (56 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (52 papers). Douglas Biber is often cited by papers focused on Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (61 papers), Linguistic Variation and Morphology (56 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (52 papers). Douglas Biber collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Douglas Biber's co-authors include Susan Conrad, Edward Finegan, Geoffrey Leech, Bethany Gray, Randi Reppen, Stig Johansson, Jesse Egbert, Shelley Staples, Federica Barbieri and Kornwipa Poonpon and has published in prestigious journals such as Language, Modern Language Journal and TESOL Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

Douglas Biber

172 papers receiving 17.6k citations

Hit Papers

Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English 1986 2026 1999 2012 2000 1988 1986 2009 2004 1000 2.0k 3.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Douglas Biber United States 59 11.2k 9.6k 6.6k 6.2k 3.6k 179 21.0k
Geoffrey Leech United Kingdom 43 9.6k 0.9× 4.7k 0.5× 2.8k 0.4× 3.9k 0.6× 3.6k 1.0× 116 15.0k
Ken Hyland United Kingdom 73 10.4k 0.9× 15.6k 1.6× 6.1k 0.9× 2.5k 0.4× 3.9k 1.1× 231 22.8k
Μ. Α. Κ. Halliday Australia 34 8.4k 0.8× 7.4k 0.8× 2.6k 0.4× 2.2k 0.4× 4.0k 1.1× 90 17.0k
Emanuel A. Schegloff United States 46 22.8k 2.0× 9.7k 1.0× 2.9k 0.4× 3.6k 0.6× 10.6k 3.0× 70 30.3k
Harvey Sacks United States 15 15.5k 1.4× 6.4k 0.7× 2.3k 0.4× 2.7k 0.4× 7.0k 2.0× 20 22.1k
Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen Hong Kong 27 6.3k 0.6× 6.6k 0.7× 1.7k 0.3× 1.7k 0.3× 2.8k 0.8× 100 12.9k
Penelope Brown Netherlands 25 10.6k 1.0× 5.0k 0.5× 1.5k 0.2× 1.5k 0.2× 4.7k 1.3× 70 16.6k
Charles Goodwin United States 35 8.1k 0.7× 3.5k 0.4× 2.6k 0.4× 965 0.2× 4.6k 1.3× 63 14.3k
Stephen Krashen United States 44 13.7k 1.2× 8.7k 0.9× 9.9k 1.5× 1.6k 0.3× 1.5k 0.4× 215 20.5k
Rod Ellis New Zealand 67 19.7k 1.8× 12.9k 1.4× 12.9k 2.0× 1.6k 0.3× 1.6k 0.5× 173 24.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Biber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Biber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Biber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Biber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Biber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Biber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Biber. The network helps show where Douglas Biber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Douglas Biber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Douglas Biber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Douglas Biber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Douglas Biber. Douglas Biber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Biber, Douglas, Tove Larsson, Gregory R. Hancock, et al.. (2024). Comparing theory-based models of grammatical complexity in student writing. 11(1). 145–177. 2 indexed citations
3.
Larsson, Tove, Tony Berber Sardinha, Bethany Gray, & Douglas Biber. (2023). Exploring early L2 writing development through the lens of grammatical complexity. 3(3). 100077–100077. 5 indexed citations
4.
Laippala, Veronika, et al.. (2022). Register identification from the unrestricted open Web using the Corpus of Online Registers of English. Language Resources and Evaluation. 57(3). 1045–1079. 3 indexed citations
5.
Biber, Douglas, et al.. (2015). The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 80 indexed citations
6.
Aarts, Bas, Mark Davies, Nicholas Smith, et al.. (2013). The Verb Phrase in English. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 27 indexed citations
7.
Biber, Douglas, Ulla Connor, & Thomas A. Upton. (2007). Discourse on the Move. 293 indexed citations
8.
Biber, Douglas. (2006). University Language. 369 indexed citations
9.
Biber, Douglas. (1993). Language : Contexts and consequences. By Howard Giles and Nikolas Coupland. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1991. Pp. xvi, 244. Paper $21.00.. Language. 69(4). 856–857. 520 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Biber, Douglas. (1993). Using register-diversified corpora for general language studies. Computational Linguistics. 19(2). 219–241. 122 indexed citations
11.
Biber, Douglas. (1993). Co-occurrence patterns among collocations: a tool for corpus-based lexical knowledge acquisition. Computational Linguistics. 19(3). 531–538. 35 indexed citations
16.
Biber, Douglas. (1986). Strategies of discourse comprehension . By Teun A. van Dijk and Walter Kintsch. New York: Academic Press, 1983. Pp. xi, 418. $38.50.. Language. 62(3). 664–668. 977 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026