Fabio Parasecoli
- Food Science top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Plant Science
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Peter ScholliersMihai VargaSimone PirasLaura LindenfeldEszter Krasznai KovácsDiana MincytėŁukasz ŁuczajBeth Forrest
- Topics
- Culinary Culture and Tourism (29 papers)Organic Food and Agriculture (6 papers)Media, Gender, and Advertising (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPlantsFrontiers in Public Health
- Partner nations
- United StatesPolandCanada
In The Last Decade
Fabio Parasecoli
40 papers receiving 269 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Food Science 177
- Sociology and Political Science 93
- Plant Science 58
- Gender Studies 48
- Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 24
Countries citing papers authored by Fabio Parasecoli
This map shows the geographic impact of Fabio Parasecoli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fabio Parasecoli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fabio Parasecoli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fabio Parasecoli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fabio Parasecoli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fabio Parasecoli. The network helps show where Fabio Parasecoli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fabio Parasecoli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fabio Parasecoli. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fabio Parasecoli based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fabio Parasecoli. Fabio Parasecoli is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | A cultural history of food | 5 |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | Bootylicious: Food and the Female Body in Contemporary Black Pop Culture | 6 |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Fabio Parasecoli
Fabio Parasecoli is a scholar working on Food Science, Gender Studies and Geography, Planning and Development, having authored 42 papers that have together received 305 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Culinary Culture and Tourism (29 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (6 papers) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (24 citations), Food Science (177 citations) and Gender Studies (48 citations). Fabio Parasecoli has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Peter Scholliers, Mihai Varga, Simone Piras, Laura Lindenfeld, Eszter Krasznai Kovács, Diana Mincytė, Łukasz Łuczaj, Beth Forrest and Jeffrey M. Pilcher. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Plants and Frontiers in Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.