Eve M. Brank

846 total citations
45 papers, 508 citations indexed

About

Eve M. Brank is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Eve M. Brank has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 508 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 17 papers in Clinical Psychology and 12 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Eve M. Brank's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (10 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (6 papers). Eve M. Brank is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (10 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (6 papers). Eve M. Brank collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Latvia. Eve M. Brank's co-authors include Lindsey E. Wylie, Angela R. Gover, John M. MacDonald, Mark R. Fondacaro, Stephen W. Smith, Ann P. Daunic, Veda E. Brown, Scott A. Miller, Randall D. Penfield and Richard L. Wiener and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

In The Last Decade

Eve M. Brank

42 papers receiving 454 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Eve M. Brank United States	13	233	206	140	111	103	45	508
Jennifer L. Klein United States	10	150 0.6×	183 0.9×	237 1.7×	171 1.5×	33 0.3×	28	474
Thalia González United States	9	233 1.0×	130 0.6×	100 0.7×	321 2.9×	39 0.4×	28	558
Sarah W. Craun United States	15	471 2.0×	523 2.5×	107 0.8×	131 1.2×	126 1.2×	36	814
Que‐Lam Huynh United States	13	444 1.9×	253 1.2×	195 1.4×	107 1.0×	37 0.4×	23	618
Ruhi Khalid Pakistan	11	122 0.5×	137 0.7×	133 0.9×	76 0.7×	42 0.4×	33	378
Kendra Thomas United States	13	169 0.7×	114 0.6×	198 1.4×	96 0.9×	64 0.6×	37	410
Vicki Peyton United States	9	138 0.6×	173 0.8×	142 1.0×	224 2.0×	55 0.5×	15	506
Barbara Sims United States	13	330 1.4×	171 0.8×	42 0.3×	61 0.5×	59 0.6×	24	504
Miia Bask Sweden	9	116 0.5×	193 0.9×	142 1.0×	91 0.8×	65 0.6×	24	458
Brie Diamond United States	11	508 2.2×	514 2.5×	156 1.1×	73 0.7×	75 0.7×	19	840

Countries citing papers authored by Eve M. Brank

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eve M. Brank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eve M. Brank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eve M. Brank more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eve M. Brank

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eve M. Brank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eve M. Brank. The network helps show where Eve M. Brank may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eve M. Brank

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eve M. Brank. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eve M. Brank based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eve M. Brank. Eve M. Brank is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

LaDuke, Casey, et al.. (2024). Training, practice, and career considerations in forensic psychology: results from a field survey of clinical and non-clinical professionals in the United States. Frontiers in Psychology. 15. 1439874–1439874.

Brank, Eve M., et al.. (2023). Identifying and Unpacking the Role of Social Identity in Moderating Evaluations of Police-Civilian Interactions. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 38(4). 956–981. 1 indexed citations

Devine, Dennis J., et al.. (2022). The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis.. Law and Human Behavior. 46(2). 121–139. 7 indexed citations

Brank, Eve M. & Lindsey E. Wylie. (2021). Legal Responsibility Among the Young and the Elderly. Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 17(1). 93–108. 1 indexed citations

Carlson, Matthew W., et al.. (2020). Evaluating the Facilitating Attuned Interactions (FAN) approach: Vicarious Trauma, professional Burnout, and reflective practice. Children and Youth Services Review. 112. 104925–104925. 23 indexed citations

Andersen, Jennifer A., Lindsey E. Wylie, & Eve M. Brank. (2017). Public health framing and attribution: Analysis of the first lady’s remarks and news coverage on childhood obesity. Cogent Social Sciences. 3(1). 1268748–1268748. 4 indexed citations

Piquero, Nicole Leeper, et al.. (2016). Exploring Lawyer Misconduct: An Examination of the Self-Regulation Process. Deviant Behavior. 37(5). 573–584. 4 indexed citations

Hamm, Joseph A., Lindsey E. Wylie, & Eve M. Brank. (2016). Measuring Older Adult Confidence in the Courts and Law Enforcement. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 29(3). 301–316. 5 indexed citations

Brank, Eve M. & Lindsey E. Wylie. (2013). Let’s discuss: Teaching students about discussions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7 indexed citations

10.

Brank, Eve M., Lindsey E. Wylie, & Joseph A. Hamm. (2012). Potential for Self-reporting.pdf. 19. 351–384. 5 indexed citations

11.

Brank, Eve M., et al.. (2011). Holding parents responsible: Is vicarious responsibility the public's answer to juvenile crime?. Psychology Public Policy and Law. 17(4). 507–529. 8 indexed citations

12.

Wylie, Lindsey E., Chris L. Gibson, Eve M. Brank, et al.. (2010). Assessing School and Student Predictors of Weapons Reporting. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice. 8(4). 351–372. 10 indexed citations

13.

Driver, Christine & Eve M. Brank. (2009). Juveniles' knowledge of the court process: results from instruction from an electronic source. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 27(4). 627–642. 4 indexed citations

14.

Brank, Eve M. & Jodi Lane. (2008). Punishing My Parents. Criminal Justice Policy Review. 19(3). 333–348. 6 indexed citations

15.

Brank, Eve M.. (2007). Elder research: filling an important gap in psychology and law. Behavioral Sciences & the Law. 25(5). 701–716. 15 indexed citations

16.

Brank, Eve M., Jodi Lane, Susan Turner, Terry Fain, & Amber Sehgal. (2007). An Experimental Juvenile Probation Program. Crime & Delinquency. 54(2). 193–224. 16 indexed citations

17.

Brank, Eve M., et al.. (2006). All Parents Are to Blame (Except This One): Global Versus Specific Attitudes Related to Parental Responsibility Laws¹. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 36(11). 2670–2684. 12 indexed citations

18.

Brank, Eve M., et al.. (2005). Parental Responsibility Statutes: An Organization and Policy Implications. Insecta mundi. 43(5). 647–652. 13 indexed citations

19.

Brank, Eve M., et al.. (2004). Paying for the crimes of their children: Public support of parental responsibility. Journal of Criminal Justice. 32(5). 465–475. 14 indexed citations

20.

Brank, Eve M., et al.. (2001). Parental Compliance: Its Role in Terimination of Parental Rights Cases. Nebraska law review. 80(2). 5. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact