Eve M. Brank
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lindsey E. WylieAngela R. GoverJohn M. MacDonaldMark R. FondacaroStephen W. SmithAnn P. DaunicVeda E. BrownScott A. Miller
- Topics
- Child Abuse and Trauma (10 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers)Crime Patterns and Interventions (6 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaFrontiers in PsychologyJournal of Youth and Adolescence
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomLatvia
In The Last Decade
Eve M. Brank
42 papers receiving 454 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Sociology and Political Science 233
- Clinical Psychology 206
- Social Psychology 140
- Education 111
- Health 103
Countries citing papers authored by Eve M. Brank
This map shows the geographic impact of Eve M. Brank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eve M. Brank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eve M. Brank more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eve M. Brank
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eve M. Brank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eve M. Brank. The network helps show where Eve M. Brank may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eve M. Brank
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eve M. Brank. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eve M. Brank based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eve M. Brank. Eve M. Brank is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | Let’s discuss: Teaching students about discussions | 7 |
| 10 | Potential for Self-reporting.pdf | 5 |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | Parental Compliance: Its Role in Terimination of Parental Rights Cases | 3 |
About Eve M. Brank
Eve M. Brank is a scholar working on Health, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 45 papers that have together received 508 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (10 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (7 papers) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (103 citations), Clinical Psychology (206 citations) and Social Psychology (140 citations). Eve M. Brank has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Latvia. Frequent co-authors include Lindsey E. Wylie, Angela R. Gover, John M. MacDonald, Mark R. Fondacaro, Stephen W. Smith, Ann P. Daunic, Veda E. Brown, Scott A. Miller, Randall D. Penfield and Richard L. Wiener. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Youth and Adolescence.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.