David DeMatteo
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending 50
- Child Abuse and Trauma 10
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 9
-
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis 27
- Crime Patterns and Interventions 17
- Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment 11
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Counseling Practices and Supervision 9
- Health top 10%
-
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes 13
David DeMatteo
93 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
- Sociology and Political Science 805
- Gender Studies 130
- Social Psychology 264
- Health 97
Countries citing papers authored by David DeMatteo
This map shows the geographic impact of David DeMatteo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David DeMatteo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David DeMatteo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David DeMatteo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David DeMatteo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David DeMatteo. The network helps show where David DeMatteo may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside David DeMatteo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 5 | The Application of Mercy: Equal Treatment for All Youth Who Commit Sex Offenses | 2020 | 1 |
| 6 | 2017 | 7 | |
| 7 | Reducing the Dangers of Future Dangerousness Testimony: Applying the Federal Rules of Evidence to Capital Sentencing | 2017 | 2 |
| 8 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 10 | Safe From Subpoena? The Importance of Certificates of Confidentiality to the Viability and Ethics of Research | 2015 | 3 |
| 11 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 13 | The Importance of Safety Training in Forensic Psychology Graduate Programs | 2013 | 2 |
| 14 | 2012 | 20 | |
| 15 | The Disconnect Between Assessment and Intervention in the Risk Management of Criminal Offenders | 2010 | 3 |
| 16 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 39 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 30 | |
| 19 | Applying Principles of Forensic Mental Health Assessment to Capital Sentencing | 2004 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 53 |
About David DeMatteo
David DeMatteo is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 101 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (50 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (27 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (17 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (13 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (11 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (10 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (9 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Sociology and Political Science (805 citations) and Gender Studies (130 citations). David DeMatteo has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Kirk Heilbrun, John F. Edens, Geoffrey Marczyk, Douglas B. Marlowe, David S. Festinger, Casey LaDuke, Jennifer Cox, Megan J. Murphy, Nicholas S. Patapis and Shannon Toney Smith. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, Frontiers in Psychology and Psychological Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.