Emmanuel Sander

643 total citations
40 papers, 309 citations indexed

About

Emmanuel Sander is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Emmanuel Sander has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 309 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 18 papers in Education and 17 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Emmanuel Sander's work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (17 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (16 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (11 papers). Emmanuel Sander is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (17 papers), Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques (16 papers) and Child and Animal Learning Development (11 papers). Emmanuel Sander collaborates with scholars based in France, Switzerland and Luxembourg. Emmanuel Sander's co-authors include Jean‐François Richard, Jean‐Pierre Thibaut, Elena Pasquinelli, Ellen Moss, Katherine Pascuzzo, Annie Bernier, Raphaële Miljkovitch, Jean‐Paul Fischer, Gérard Sensevy and Emmanuel Trouche and has published in prestigious journals such as Cognition, Journal of Experimental Psychology General and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Emmanuel Sander

33 papers receiving 272 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emmanuel Sander France 11 149 138 106 52 39 40 309
Matthew Saxton United Kingdom 9 145 1.0× 136 1.0× 160 1.5× 43 0.8× 44 1.1× 14 301
Eduardo Martí Spain 10 166 1.1× 86 0.6× 105 1.0× 19 0.4× 48 1.2× 50 319
Thomas E. Hunt United Kingdom 9 188 1.3× 84 0.6× 58 0.5× 146 2.8× 85 2.2× 18 379
Abbey M. Loehr United States 10 248 1.7× 175 1.3× 220 2.1× 110 2.1× 15 0.4× 17 436
Yonghan Park United States 12 179 1.2× 58 0.4× 262 2.5× 48 0.9× 37 0.9× 30 385
Michèle Venet Canada 9 94 0.6× 43 0.3× 151 1.4× 30 0.6× 28 0.7× 24 291
Josefine Karlsson Netherlands 6 105 0.7× 54 0.4× 212 2.0× 69 1.3× 12 0.3× 6 336
Helena P. Osana Canada 14 329 2.2× 205 1.5× 171 1.6× 67 1.3× 20 0.5× 39 431
Kejin Lee United States 8 149 1.0× 152 1.1× 227 2.1× 45 0.9× 24 0.6× 17 373
Marloes M. L. Muijselaar Netherlands 11 150 1.0× 43 0.3× 265 2.5× 40 0.8× 25 0.6× 12 349

Countries citing papers authored by Emmanuel Sander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emmanuel Sander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emmanuel Sander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emmanuel Sander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emmanuel Sander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emmanuel Sander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emmanuel Sander. The network helps show where Emmanuel Sander may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emmanuel Sander

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emmanuel Sander. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emmanuel Sander based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emmanuel Sander. Emmanuel Sander is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Audrin, Catherine, et al.. (2025). The impact of augmented reality on biodiversity learning: An experimental study. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 20. 100801–100801.
2.
Sander, Emmanuel. (2025). Un maillage analogique de la résolution de problèmes arithmétiques : le cadre A-S3. Éducation & didactique. 19(1). 51–70.
3.
Tricot, André, et al.. (2024). Improving transfer of problem-solving skills through worked-examples and analogy? A 5th grade classroom study.. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository.
4.
Thibaut, Jean‐Pierre, et al.. (2024). Uncovering the interplay between drawings, mental representations, and arithmetic problem-solving strategies in children and adults. Memory & Cognition. 53(1). 76–95. 1 indexed citations
5.
Rämä, Pia, et al.. (2024). Neural correlates of unconventional verb extensions reveal preschoolers’ analogical abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 246. 105984–105984.
6.
Pasquinelli, Elena, et al.. (2022). Enhancing cognitive flexibility through a training based on multiple categorization: Developing proportional reasoning in primary school. Journal of Numerical Cognition. 8(3). 443–472. 6 indexed citations
7.
Sander, Emmanuel, et al.. (2022). Reconsidering conceptual knowledge: Heterogeneity of its components. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 227. 105587–105587.
8.
Thibaut, Jean‐Pierre, et al.. (2021). What we count dictates how we count: A tale of two encodings. Cognition. 212. 104665–104665. 10 indexed citations
9.
Sander, Emmanuel, et al.. (2020). Are Superficially Dissimilar Analogs better retrieved than Superficially Similar Disanalogs?. Acta Psychologica. 203. 102989–102989. 9 indexed citations
10.
Sander, Emmanuel, et al.. (2019). When masters of abstraction run into a concrete wall: Experts failing arithmetic word problems. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 26(5). 1738–1746. 16 indexed citations
11.
Sander, Emmanuel, et al.. (2019). Learning to be an opportunistic word problem solver: going beyond informal solving strategies. ZDM. 52(1). 111–123. 18 indexed citations
12.
Sander, Emmanuel, et al.. (2017). Solving additive word problems: Intuitive strategies make the difference. Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva). 2 indexed citations
13.
Miljkovitch, Raphaële, Ellen Moss, Annie Bernier, Katherine Pascuzzo, & Emmanuel Sander. (2015). Refining the assessment of internal working models: the Attachment Multiple Model Interview. Attachment & Human Development. 17(5). 492–521. 25 indexed citations
14.
Thibaut, Jean‐Pierre, et al.. (2015). Robustness of semantic encoding effects in a transfer task for multiple-strategy arithmetic problems. Cognitive Science. 4 indexed citations
15.
Trouche, Emmanuel, Emmanuel Sander, & Hugo Mercier. (2014). Arguments, more than confidence, explain the good performance of reasoning groups.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 143(5). 1958–1971. 10 indexed citations
16.
Hofstadter, Douglas R. & Emmanuel Sander. (2013). The forgotten fuel of our minds. The New Scientist. 30–33. 1 indexed citations
17.
Sander, Emmanuel, et al.. (2009). Arithmetic word problem solving: a Situation Strategy First framework. Developmental Science. 13(1). 92–107. 29 indexed citations
18.
Sander, Emmanuel. (2007). Manipuler l’habillage d’un problème pour évaluer les apprentissages. Bulletin de psychologie. Numéro hors-série(HS). 119–124. 3 indexed citations
19.
Richard, Jean‐François & Emmanuel Sander. (2005). In Defense of Psychological Essentialism. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 27(27). 6 indexed citations
20.
Sander, Emmanuel & Jean‐François Richard. (1997). Analogical transfer as guided by an abstraction process: The case of learning by doing in text editing.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 23(6). 1459–1483. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026