Helen Minnis

6.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
167 papers, 3.9k citations indexed

About

Helen Minnis is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Helen Minnis has authored 167 papers receiving a total of 3.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 133 papers in Clinical Psychology, 72 papers in Safety Research and 26 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Helen Minnis's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (75 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (71 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (70 papers). Helen Minnis is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (75 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (71 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (70 papers). Helen Minnis collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Canada. Helen Minnis's co-authors include Christopher Gillberg, Philip Wilson, Rebecca Lacey, Lucy Thompson, David Young, Eva Kočovská, Rachel Pritchett, Louise Hunter, Melody Terras and Anthony J. Pelosi and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Nature Medicine and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Helen Minnis

150 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Hit Papers

Practitioner Review: Twenty years of research with advers... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Helen Minnis United Kingdom 34 2.7k 1.3k 581 528 490 167 3.9k
Stephen Scott United Kingdom 38 3.6k 1.3× 606 0.5× 825 1.4× 582 1.1× 921 1.9× 137 5.0k
Ramón Lindauer Netherlands 33 2.3k 0.9× 427 0.3× 458 0.8× 306 0.6× 318 0.6× 161 3.5k
Joseph Spinazzola United States 38 5.0k 1.9× 924 0.7× 247 0.4× 606 1.1× 651 1.3× 69 5.9k
Einar Heiervang Norway 33 2.4k 0.9× 303 0.2× 617 1.1× 323 0.6× 541 1.1× 67 3.9k
Lenneke R. A. Alink Netherlands 35 5.0k 1.9× 918 0.7× 299 0.5× 875 1.7× 1.5k 3.1× 125 6.1k
Jennie G. Noll United States 41 3.9k 1.5× 483 0.4× 213 0.4× 708 1.3× 613 1.3× 118 5.6k
Theo Doreleijers Netherlands 37 3.7k 1.4× 584 0.5× 535 0.9× 1.1k 2.2× 1.9k 3.9× 138 5.5k
Fred A. Rogosch United States 38 5.7k 2.1× 894 0.7× 313 0.5× 839 1.6× 1.5k 3.2× 79 7.0k
Assaf Oshri United States 34 2.3k 0.9× 324 0.3× 261 0.4× 695 1.3× 648 1.3× 136 3.5k
Fred A. Rogosch United States 47 5.4k 2.0× 695 0.5× 291 0.5× 707 1.3× 1.6k 3.3× 75 6.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Helen Minnis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Minnis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Minnis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Minnis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Minnis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Minnis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Minnis. The network helps show where Helen Minnis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Minnis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Minnis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Minnis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Minnis. Helen Minnis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Minnis, Helen, et al.. (2025). Household income and children’s mental health outcomes: the mediating role of maternal wellbeing and parent–child relationship quality. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 34(11). 3601–3611.
2.
Kelleher, Ian, Anita Thapar, Bernadka Dubicka, et al.. (2025). Professorships in child and adolescent psychiatry relative to a similarly sized medical specialty in the UK and Ireland: cross-sectional study. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 226(4). 222–225. 1 indexed citations
3.
Lu, Szu‐Ching, Lucy Thompson, Bengt Hagberg, et al.. (2025). Motor organisation of social play in children with autism. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 22(232). 20250302–20250302.
6.
Chitsabesan, Prathiba, Tamsin Ford, Louise Gallagher, et al.. (2025). Trends in annual and lifetime prevalence of child and adolescent mental health service use in the UK between 1991 and 2023: Welsh healthcare register linkage study. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 1–8.
7.
Hardie, Iain, Aja Louise Murray, Louise Marryat, et al.. (2024). Investigating low birth weight and preterm birth as potential mediators in the relationship between prenatal infections and early child development: a linked administrative health data analysis. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 78(9). 585–590. 1 indexed citations
8.
Wilson, Philip, et al.. (2024). Interventions for pre‐school children in foster care: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of child‐related outcomes. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5(1). e12273–e12273.
11.
Gajwani, Ruchika, et al.. (2023). Where Are the Children?: Addiction Workers’ Knowledge of Clients’ Offspring and Related Risks. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 6(4). 675–686. 2 indexed citations
12.
Atkinson, Carol, et al.. (2023). Introducing a randomized controlled trial into Family Proceedings: Describing the ‘how?’ and defending the ‘why?’. International Journal of Law Policy and the Family. 37(1). 1 indexed citations
13.
Wright, Barry, Pasco Fearon, Danya Glaser, et al.. (2023). Routinely used interventions to improve attachment in infants and young children: a national survey and two systematic reviews. Health Technology Assessment. 27(2). 1–226. 6 indexed citations
14.
Rooksby, Maki, et al.. (2021). The School Attachment Monitor—A novel computational tool for assessment of attachment in middle childhood. PLoS ONE. 16(7). e0240277–e0240277. 2 indexed citations
15.
Minnis, Helen, et al.. (2021). Escaping the inescapable: Risk of mental health disorder, somatic symptoms and resilience in Palestinian refugee children. Transcultural Psychiatry. 58(2). 307–320. 21 indexed citations
16.
Bosmans, Guy, et al.. (2020). Current Perspectives on the Management of Reactive Attachment Disorder in Early Education. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
17.
McConnachie, Alex, Helen Minnis, Philip Wilson, et al.. (2019). Phase 3 diagnostic evaluation of a smart tablet serious game to identify autism in 760 children 3–5 years old in Sweden and the United Kingdom. BMJ Open. 9(7). e026226–e026226. 17 indexed citations
18.
Deidda, Manuela, Kathleen Boyd, Helen Minnis, et al.. (2018). Protocol for the economic evaluation of a complex intervention to improve the mental health of maltreated infants and children in foster care in the UK (The BeST? services trial). BMJ Open. 8(3). e020066–e020066. 11 indexed citations
19.
Minnis, Helen, Kathleen Boyd, Christopher Gillberg, et al.. (2016). Protocol 15PRT/6090:The Best Services Trial (BeST?): effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the New Orleans Intervention Model for Infant Mental Health − NCT02653716. The Lancet. 3 indexed citations
20.
Minnis, Helen. (2004). How can foster carers help children with complex mental health and attachment problems?. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026