Helen Minnis
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Safety Research top 0.2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Christopher GillbergPhilip WilsonRebecca LaceyLucy ThompsonDavid YoungEva KočovskáRachel PritchettLouise Hunter
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (75 papers)Child Welfare and Adoption (71 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (70 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetNature MedicineSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenCanada
In The Last Decade
Helen Minnis
150 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Clinical Psychology 2.7k
- Safety Research 1.3k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 581
- Sociology and Political Science 528
- Social Psychology 490
Countries citing papers authored by Helen Minnis
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Minnis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Minnis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Minnis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Minnis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Minnis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Minnis. The network helps show where Helen Minnis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Minnis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Minnis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Minnis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Minnis. Helen Minnis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | Current Perspectives on the Management of Reactive Attachment Disorder in Early Education | 0 |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | Protocol 15PRT/6090:The Best Services Trial (BeST?): effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the New Orleans Intervention Model for Infant Mental Health − NCT02653716 | 3 |
| 19 | Measuring attachment in large population studies: a systematic review | 3 |
| 20 | How can foster carers help children with complex mental health and attachment problems? | 1 |
About Helen Minnis
Helen Minnis is a scholar working on Safety Research, Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 167 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (75 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (71 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (70 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (1.3k citations), Clinical Psychology (2.7k citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (118 citations). Helen Minnis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Gillberg, Philip Wilson, Rebecca Lacey, Lucy Thompson, David Young, Eva Kočovská, Rachel Pritchett, Louise Hunter, Melody Terras and Anthony J. Pelosi. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Nature Medicine and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.