Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.
2012301 citationsAnn Netten, Juliette Malley et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann Netten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann Netten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann Netten more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann Netten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann Netten. The network helps show where Ann Netten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann Netten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann Netten.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann Netten based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ann Netten. Ann Netten is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rand, Stacey, Juliette Malley, & Ann Netten. (2012). Measuring the social care outcomes of informal carers: an interim technical report for the Identifying the Impact of Social Care (IIASC) study. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).11 indexed citations
Netten, Ann, Birgit Trukeschitz, Julie Beadle‐Brown, Ann‐Marie Towers, & Julien Forder. (2010). Measuring Outcomes for Residents of Care Homes. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).3 indexed citations
5.
Netten, Ann, et al.. (2008). Measuring outcomes for carers. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).2 indexed citations
6.
Curtis, Lesley A. & Ann Netten. (2005). Are pharmacists worth the investment in their training and the ongoing costs?. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).2 indexed citations
7.
Newburn, Tim, Adam Crawford, Rod Earle, et al.. (2002). The Introduction of Referral Orders into the Youth Justice System: Final report. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).35 indexed citations
8.
Bebbington, Andrew, Robin Darton, & Ann Netten. (2001). Care homes for older people: Volume 2 Admissions, needs and outcomes. The 1995/96 National Longitudinal Survey of Publicly-Funded Admissions. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 30–6.29 indexed citations
9.
Netten, Ann, Andrew Bebbington, Robin Darton, & Julien Forder. (2001). Care Homes for Older People: Volume 1. Facilities, Residents and Costs. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).18 indexed citations
10.
Newburn, Tim, Adam Crawford, Rod Earle, et al.. (2001). The introduction of referral orders into the youth justice system: second interim report. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).10 indexed citations
11.
Emerson, Eric, Janet Robertson, Nicola Gregory, et al.. (2000). The quality and costs of village communities, residential campuses and community-based residential supports in the UK. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).4 indexed citations
12.
Kernick, David, et al.. (2000). What does it cost the patient to see the doctor?. PubMed. 50(454). 401–3.13 indexed citations
13.
Schneider, Jennifer, Ann Netten, Caroline Mozley, et al.. (1998). Care homes. Home truths.. PubMed. 108(5587). 30–1.2 indexed citations
14.
Schneider, Justine, et al.. (1997). Exploring quality in residential care for elderly people. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).3 indexed citations
15.
Schneider, Justine, Anthony Mann, & Ann Netten. (1997). Residential care for elderly people: an exploratory study of quality measurement. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).3 indexed citations
16.
Netten, Ann, et al.. (1995). Length of stay and mortality of nursing home residents. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).1 indexed citations
17.
Hallam, Angela, Robin Darton, Emma McIntosh, & Ann Netten. (1994). The Personal Social Services Research Unit. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).290 indexed citations
18.
Netten, Ann. (1993). A Positive Environment?. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).10 indexed citations
19.
Netten, Ann. (1992). A positive experience? Assessing the effects of the social environment on demented elderly residents of local authority homes. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).2 indexed citations
20.
Netten, Ann. (1989). The effect of the design of residential homes in creating dependency among confused elderly residents. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.