Matthew Feinberg
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Cultural Differences and Values 14
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Social and Intergroup Psychology 22
- Climate Change Communication and Perception 6
- Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation 6
- Communication top 1%
- Social Media and Politics 6
- Literature and Literary Theory top 0.5%
-
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 14
-
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 8
-
- Environmental Education and Sustainability 6
Matthew Feinberg
50 papers receiving 3.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Applied Psychology 341
- Social Psychology 1.2k
- Sociology and Political Science 2.5k
- Communication 393
- Literature and Literary Theory 479
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Feinberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Feinberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Feinberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Feinberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Feinberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Feinberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Feinberg. The network helps show where Matthew Feinberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Feinberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 33 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 111 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 154 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 9 | |
| 14 | 2018 | 63 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 16 | Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior.breakdown → | 2015 | 693 |
| 17 | 2013 | 38 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 258 | |
| 19 | 2011 | 101 | |
| 20 | The "Rules" of Brainstorming: An Impediment to Creativity? | 2008 | 3 |
About Matthew Feinberg
Matthew Feinberg is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Communication and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 51 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (22 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (14 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (14 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers), Social Media and Politics (6 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (6 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (6 papers) and Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (341 citations), Social Psychology (1.2k citations) and Sociology and Political Science (2.5k citations). Matthew Feinberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include Robb Willer, Dacher Keltner, Paul K. Piff, Paul Dietze, Daniel M. Stancato, Michael Schultz, Chloe Kovacheff, Jennifer E. Stellar, Oliver P. John and Brett Q. Ford. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.