Jack Glaser

8.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
40 papers, 5.1k citations indexed

About

Jack Glaser is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Jack Glaser has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 5.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Social Psychology and 8 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Jack Glaser's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (20 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (8 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers). Jack Glaser is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (20 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (8 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (7 papers). Jack Glaser collaborates with scholars based in United States, Israel and South Korea. Jack Glaser's co-authors include John T. Jost, Frank J. Sulloway, Arie W. Kruglanski, Donald P. Green, Mahzarin R. Banaji, Andrew Rich, Eric D. Knowles, Peter Salovey, Christopher Finn and Irene V. Blair and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Psychological Bulletin and Personality and Social Psychology Review.

In The Last Decade

Jack Glaser

40 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Hit Papers

Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. 2003 2026 2010 2018 2003 1000 2.0k 3.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jack Glaser United States 19 3.8k 2.0k 946 821 453 40 5.1k
Eran Halperin Israel 41 3.9k 1.0× 2.5k 1.3× 876 0.9× 494 0.6× 279 0.6× 192 5.4k
Elizabeth Levy Paluck United States 23 3.3k 0.9× 1.7k 0.8× 546 0.6× 526 0.6× 811 1.8× 58 5.5k
Christopher M. Federico United States 34 3.6k 0.9× 1.6k 0.8× 650 0.7× 1.3k 1.5× 480 1.1× 85 4.7k
Alain Van Hiel Belgium 47 4.6k 1.2× 3.3k 1.6× 1.1k 1.1× 566 0.7× 478 1.1× 192 6.9k
Craig McGarty Australia 43 5.1k 1.3× 3.0k 1.5× 665 0.7× 419 0.5× 579 1.3× 120 7.1k
Kevin B. Smith United States 29 2.3k 0.6× 1.1k 0.5× 852 0.9× 659 0.8× 241 0.5× 119 3.7k
Mark J. Brandt Netherlands 33 2.5k 0.6× 1.7k 0.8× 984 1.0× 368 0.4× 275 0.6× 118 3.8k
Nour Kteily United States 29 3.1k 0.8× 2.0k 1.0× 778 0.8× 320 0.4× 500 1.1× 70 3.9k
Shana Levin United States 35 4.8k 1.2× 2.8k 1.4× 475 0.5× 480 0.6× 1.3k 2.8× 54 6.1k
Jaime L. Napier United States 22 2.3k 0.6× 1.4k 0.7× 443 0.5× 559 0.7× 498 1.1× 34 3.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Jack Glaser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jack Glaser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jack Glaser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jack Glaser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jack Glaser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jack Glaser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jack Glaser. The network helps show where Jack Glaser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jack Glaser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jack Glaser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jack Glaser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jack Glaser. Jack Glaser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Glaser, Jack, et al.. (2021). Suspicion and Discretion in Policing: How Laws and Policies Contribute to Inequity. eYLS (Yale Law School). 11(5). 1327. 3 indexed citations
2.
Geller, Amanda, et al.. (2020). Measuring Racial Disparities in Police Use of Force: Methods Matter. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 37(4). 1083–1113. 18 indexed citations
3.
Glaser, Jack, et al.. (2016). Implicit Bias and Policing. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. 10(1). 50–63. 94 indexed citations
4.
Glaser, Jack, Karin D. Martin, & Kimberly Barsamian Kahn. (2015). Possibility of death sentence has divergent effect on verdicts for Black and White defendants.. Law and Human Behavior. 39(6). 539–546. 13 indexed citations
5.
Glaser, Jack. (2014). Suspect Race. Oxford University Press eBooks. 32 indexed citations
6.
Hackney, Amy & Jack Glaser. (2013). Reverse deterrence in racial profiling: Increased transgressions by nonprofiled Whites.. Law and Human Behavior. 37(5). 348–353. 5 indexed citations
7.
Glaser, Jack, et al.. (2011). Implicit Motivation to Control Prejudice and Exposure to Counterstereotypic Instances Reduce Spontaneous Discriminatory Behavior. 한국심리학회지 사회및성격. 25(4). 107–120. 6 indexed citations
8.
Hackney, Amy & Jack Glaser. (2009). Reverse Deterrence in Racial Profiling: Increased Transgressions by the Non-Profiled Group. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
9.
Jost, John T., Laurie A. Rudman, Irene V. Blair, et al.. (2009). The existence of implicit bias is beyond reasonable doubt: A refutation of ideological and methodological objections and executive summary of ten studies that no manager should ignore. Research in Organizational Behavior. 29. 39–69. 217 indexed citations
10.
Jost, John T., Laurie A. Rudman, Irene V. Blair, et al.. (2009). An invitation to Tetlock and Mitchell to conduct empirical research on implicit bias with friends, “adversaries,” or whomever they please. Research in Organizational Behavior. 29. 73–75. 4 indexed citations
11.
Glaser, Jack & Eric D. Knowles. (2007). Implicit motivation to control prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 44(1). 164–172. 125 indexed citations
12.
Glaser, Jack & Eric D. Knowles. (2006). Implicit Motivation to Control Prejudice. 1 indexed citations
13.
Stroud, Laura R., Jack Glaser, & Peter Salovey. (2005). The Effects of Partisanship and Candidate Emotionality on Voter Preference. Imagination Cognition and Personality. 25(1). 25–44. 10 indexed citations
14.
Glaser, Jack. (2005). Intergroup Bias and Inequity: Legitimizing Beliefs and Policy Attitudes. Social Justice Research. 18(3). 257–282. 27 indexed citations
15.
Jost, John T., Jack Glaser, Arie W. Kruglanski, & Frank J. Sulloway. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.. Psychological Bulletin. 129(3). 339–375. 3188 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
Glaser, Jack & Marie F. Shoffner. (2001). Adventure-Based Counseling in Schools.. Professional School Counseling. 5(1). 42–48. 15 indexed citations
17.
Glaser, Jack & Mahzarin R. Banaji. (1999). When fair is foul and foul is fair: Reverse priming in automatic evaluation.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 77(4). 669–687. 139 indexed citations
18.
Glaser, Jack & Peter Salovey. (1998). Affect in Electoral Politics. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2(3). 156–172. 77 indexed citations
19.
Green, Donald P., Jack Glaser, & Andrew Rich. (1998). From lynching to gay bashing: The elusive connection between economic conditions and hate crime.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 75(1). 82–92. 130 indexed citations
20.
Zimmerberg, Betty, et al.. (1993). Effects of prenatal alcohol exposure on the developmental pattern of temperature preference in a thermocline. Alcohol. 10(5). 403–408. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026