Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Colonial Discourse and Post-Colonial Theory: A Reader
19951.1k citationsPatrick Williams et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Patrick Williams
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Patrick Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Williams. The network helps show where Patrick Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patrick Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patrick Williams.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patrick Williams based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Patrick Williams. Patrick Williams is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Williams, Patrick. (2010). El gran Valido: El Duque de Lerma, la Corte y el gobierno de Felipe III. 1598-1621.8 indexed citations
7.
Williams, Patrick. (2009). El Duque de Lerma y el nacimiento de la Corte Barroca en España: Valladolid, verano de 1605. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
8.
Jamin, Jean & Patrick Williams. (2009). Pour une anthropologie du jazz. OpenEdition (OpenEdition). 416–417.1 indexed citations
Jamin, Jean & Patrick Williams. (2008). Jazz et anthropologie. OpenEdition (OpenEdition). 424–425.1 indexed citations
11.
Williams, Patrick & Hsin‐Liang Chen. (2008). Computer-Mediated Communication and multi-modal instruction in higher education.1 indexed citations
12.
Williams, Patrick. (2008). El favorito del rey: Francisco Gómez de Sandoval y Rojas, V Marqués de Denia y I Duque de Lerma. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 185–260.1 indexed citations
Williams, Patrick, et al.. (2005). The Continued Success of Proposition 65 in Reducing Toxic Exposures. SSRN Electronic Journal.4 indexed citations
15.
Williams, Patrick, et al.. (2004). Total Life Coaching: 50+ Life Lessons, Skills, and Techniques to Enhance Your Practice . . . and Your Life. Medical Entomology and Zoology.2 indexed citations
16.
Williams, Patrick. (2001). De la discographie et de son usage. L Homme. 179–199.1 indexed citations
17.
Williams, Patrick. (2001). Philip II.2 indexed citations
Williams, Patrick. (1990). How Should the Public Library Respond to Public Demand. Library journal. 115(17). 54–56.1 indexed citations
20.
Budd, Richard W., Brent D. Ruben, Robert F. Rich, et al.. (1979). General Mass Communication. Communication Booknotes. 10(8). 147–151.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.