Emma Bäck

511 total citations
22 papers, 273 citations indexed

About

Emma Bäck is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Bäck has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 273 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 10 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Emma Bäck's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (6 papers) and Gender Studies in Language (5 papers). Emma Bäck is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (6 papers) and Gender Studies in Language (5 papers). Emma Bäck collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Spain and Poland. Emma Bäck's co-authors include Hanna Bäck, Marie Gustafsson Sendén, Anna Lindqvist, Torun Lindholm, Nils Gustafsson, Gema García-Albacete, Mikael Gilljam, Henk Erik Meier, Peter Esaiasson and Sverker Sikström and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Emma Bäck

21 papers receiving 252 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emma Bäck Sweden	9	135	105	83	41	24	22	273
Yating Yu Hong Kong	9	85 0.6×	128 1.2×	29 0.3×	47 1.1×	14 0.6×	35	298
T. Andrew Caswell United States	5	85 0.6×	149 1.4×	88 1.1×	6 0.1×	20 0.8×	7	247
Nick Joyce United States	9	271 2.0×	77 0.7×	157 1.9×	83 2.0×	9 0.4×	12	372
Harris M. Berger United States	10	136 1.0×	46 0.4×	31 0.4×	33 0.8×	35 1.5×	19	428
Angelica Mucchi‐Faina Italy	11	184 1.4×	65 0.6×	125 1.5×	28 0.7×	6 0.3×	18	273
Caja Thimm Germany	9	72 0.5×	56 0.5×	38 0.5×	43 1.0×	4 0.2×	27	246
Rudolf P. Gaudio United States	8	202 1.5×	105 1.0×	108 1.3×	15 0.4×	132 5.5×	13	419
Sharon Lockyer United Kingdom	10	90 0.7×	109 1.0×	205 2.5×	40 1.0×	6 0.3×	25	328
Roger Jon Desmond United States	9	154 1.1×	100 1.0×	68 0.8×	106 2.6×	11 0.5×	17	394
Adelaide Haas United States	6	63 0.5×	103 1.0×	68 0.8×	24 0.6×	38 1.6×	8	301

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Bäck

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Bäck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Bäck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Bäck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Bäck

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Bäck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Bäck. The network helps show where Emma Bäck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Bäck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Bäck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Bäck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Bäck. Emma Bäck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Li, Lan, Emma Bäck, Rebecca J. Shipley, et al.. (2025). Balancing Risks and Opportunities: Data-Empowered-Health Ecosystems. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 27. e57237–e57237. 2 indexed citations

Besta, Tomasz, et al.. (2018). When mere multiple group memberships are not enough: Individual self-expansion through involvement in social groups and self-efficacy belief. Polish Psychological Bulletin. 1 indexed citations

Meier, Henk Erik, et al.. (2018). Belonging for violence: Personality, football fandom, and spectator aggression. Nordic Psychology. 70(4). 278–289. 19 indexed citations

Bäck, Emma, et al.. (2018). A social safety net? Rejection sensitivity and political opinion sharing among young people in social media. New Media & Society. 21(2). 298–316. 18 indexed citations

Bäck, Emma, et al.. (2018). From I to We: Group formation and linguistic adaption in an online xenophobic forum. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 6(1). 76–91. 13 indexed citations

Bäck, Emma, et al.. (2018). The Quest for Significance: Attitude Adaption to a Radical Group Following Social Exclusion. International Journal of Developmental Science. 12(1-2). 25–36. 23 indexed citations

Bäck, Hanna & Emma Bäck. (2017). Radikaliseringens politiska psykologi – betydelsen av hot och polarisering. 1 indexed citations

Lindqvist, Anna, Marie Gustafsson Sendén, & Emma Bäck. (2016). Vem tycker om hen. 26. 101–129. 4 indexed citations

Sendén, Marie Gustafsson, Emma Bäck, & Anna Lindqvist. (2015). Introducing a gender-neutral pronoun in a natural gender language: the influence of time on attitudes and behavior. Frontiers in Psychology. 6. 893–893. 91 indexed citations

10.

Bäck, Emma, Hanna Bäck, & Nils Gustafsson. (2015). Ungas politiska deltagande. Nya former och aktivitet genom sociala medier. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 3 indexed citations

11.

Bäck, Emma, et al.. (2015). Group belongingness and collective action: Effects of need to belong and rejection sensitivity on willingness to participate in protest activities. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 56(5). 537–544. 20 indexed citations

12.

Bäck, Emma, Anna Lindqvist, & Marie Gustafsson Sendén. (2015). Hen can do it! : Effects of using a gender-neutral pronoun in recruitment. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 71–90. 3 indexed citations

13.

Bäck, Emma & Torun Lindholm. (2014). Defending or Challenging the Status Quo: Position Effects on Biased Intergroup Perceptions. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 2(1). 77–97. 8 indexed citations

14.

Bäck, Hanna, et al.. (2014). The social activist: conformity to the ingroup following rejection as a predictor of political participation. Social Influence. 10(2). 97–108. 15 indexed citations

15.

Bäck, Emma, Hanna Bäck, & Gema García-Albacete. (2013). Protest Activity, Social Incentives, and Rejection Sensitivity. 1(1). 1–15. 15 indexed citations

16.

Bäck, Emma, Anna Lindqvist, & Marie Gustafsson Sendén. (2013). Hen can do it : Effects of using a gender neutral pronoun in a recruitment situation. 4 indexed citations

17.

Bäck, Emma. (2013). Position toward the status quo: Explaining differences in intergroup perceptions between left‐ and right‐wing affiliates. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 43(10). 2073–2082. 9 indexed citations

18.

Bäck, Emma, Peter Esaiasson, Mikael Gilljam, Ola Svenson, & Torun Lindholm. (2011). Post‐decision consolidation in large group decision‐making. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 52(4). 320–328. 8 indexed citations

19.

Bäck, Emma. (2011). Social and cognitive biases in large group decision settings. PsycEXTRA Dataset. 1 indexed citations

20.

Bäck, Emma, Peter Esaiasson, Mikael Gilljam, & Torun Lindholm. (2009). Biased attributions regarding the origins of preferences in a group decision situation. European Journal of Social Psychology. 40(2). 270–281. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact