Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Shaping cities for health: complexity and the planning of urban environments in the 21st century
2012534 citationsJames Wilson et al.The Lancetprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of James Wilson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Wilson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Wilson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Wilson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Wilson. The network helps show where James Wilson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Wilson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Wilson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Wilson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James Wilson. James Wilson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Littlejohns, Peter, Albert Weale, Katharina Kieslich, et al.. (2016). Challenges for the new Cancer Drugs Fund. The Lancet Oncology. 17(4). 416–418.9 indexed citations
Wilson, James. (2006). Microsoft on Copyright: An Ethical Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
13.
Wilson, James. (2000). The Eleventh Amendment Cases: Going 'Too Far' with Judicial Neofederalism. Loyola of Los Angeles law review. 33(4). 1687.1 indexed citations
Wilson, James. (1995). Surveying the "Forms of Doctrine" on the Bright Line Balancing Test Continuum. EngagedScholarship @ Cleveland State University (Cleveland State University). 773.2 indexed citations
16.
Wilson, James. (1993). The Role of Public Opinion in Constitutional Interpretation. Brigham Young University law review. 1993(4). 1037–1138.
17.
Wilson, James. (1992). American Constitutional Conventions: The Judicially Unenforceable Rules That Combine With Judicial Doctrine and Public Opinion to Regulate Political Behavior. Buffalo law review. 645.3 indexed citations
18.
Wilson, James. (1986). Constraints of Power: The Constitutional Opinions of Judges Scalia, Bork, Posner, Easterbrook and Winter. University of Miami law review. 40(5). 1171.1 indexed citations
19.
Wilson, James. (1985). The Most Sacred Text: The Supreme Court's Use of The Federalist Papers. Brigham Young University law review. 1985(1). 65–135.1 indexed citations
20.
Wilson, James. (1978). Gastric emptying in labour: some recent findings and their clinical significance.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 6 Suppl 1. 54–62.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.