Replace Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy with:
Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyUnited States
Narrative InquiryUnited States
Sociological ScienceUnited States
Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie SociologiqueFrance
SubjectivityUnited Kingdom
Anthropology of Work ReviewUnited States
Social InfluenceUnited States
Social PsychologyUnited States
Crime Media Culture An International JournalUnited Kingdom
Contemporary Social ScienceUnited Kingdom
Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Journal of Social and Political Psychology · 1×
×1.66.1kSPS
×1.42.5kSP
×1.1810PSIR
×1.81.2kGHP
×2.91.8kCP
Citations per year, relative to Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Journal of Social and Political Psychology · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Journal of Social and Political Psychology
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Social and Political Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Social and Political Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Social and Political Psychology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Social and Political Psychology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Social and Political Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Social and Political Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.