Emily Weinstein

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
28 papers, 771 citations indexed

About

Emily Weinstein is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Weinstein has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 771 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 15 papers in Education and 7 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Emily Weinstein's work include Child Development and Digital Technology (15 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (13 papers) and Social Media and Politics (7 papers). Emily Weinstein is often cited by papers focused on Child Development and Digital Technology (15 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (13 papers) and Social Media and Politics (7 papers). Emily Weinstein collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Emily Weinstein's co-authors include Robert L. Selman, Carrie James, Katie Davis, Linda Charmaraman, Randy S. Hebert, Lynn M. Martire, Richard Schulz, Sara Konrath, Petr Slovák and Karthik Dinakar and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PEDIATRICS and Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Emily Weinstein

27 papers receiving 730 citations

Hit Papers

The social media see-saw: Positive and negative influence... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 50 100 150

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily Weinstein United States 16 507 286 179 162 157 28 771
Samuel E. Ehrenreich United States 16 435 0.9× 335 1.2× 298 1.7× 150 0.9× 261 1.7× 32 811
Madeleine J. George United States 12 578 1.1× 406 1.4× 155 0.9× 163 1.0× 90 0.6× 23 785
Esra Ceyhan Türkiye 13 595 1.2× 331 1.2× 282 1.6× 154 1.0× 171 1.1× 41 858
Leora Trub United States 12 429 0.8× 142 0.5× 185 1.0× 93 0.6× 151 1.0× 31 658
Francesca Gioia Italy 13 549 1.1× 212 0.7× 432 2.4× 106 0.7× 124 0.8× 30 858
Hailey G. Holmgren United States 13 408 0.8× 385 1.3× 242 1.4× 98 0.6× 233 1.5× 32 746
Ashley M. Fraser United States 14 412 0.8× 467 1.6× 318 1.8× 117 0.7× 351 2.2× 40 959
Lukáš Blinka Czechia 15 870 1.7× 535 1.9× 222 1.2× 228 1.4× 107 0.7× 44 1.0k
Zahra Vahedi Canada 7 520 1.0× 201 0.7× 354 2.0× 79 0.5× 77 0.5× 20 829
Madison K. Memmott‐Elison United States 14 346 0.7× 392 1.4× 405 2.3× 76 0.5× 373 2.4× 24 888

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Weinstein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Weinstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Weinstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Weinstein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Weinstein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Weinstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Weinstein. The network helps show where Emily Weinstein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Weinstein

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Weinstein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Weinstein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Weinstein. Emily Weinstein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Konrath, Sara, et al.. (2025). Development and validation of the Tech With Care Index for teens.. Psychology of Popular Media. 14(4). 507–520. 1 indexed citations
2.
Nagata, Jason M., et al.. (2025). Health Benefits of Social Media Use in Adolescents and Young Adults. Current Pediatrics Reports. 13(1). 22–22.
3.
Coyne, Sarah M., et al.. (2023). Analysis of Social Media Use, Mental Health, and Gender Identity Among US Youths. JAMA Network Open. 6(7). e2324389–e2324389. 24 indexed citations
4.
Choukas‐Bradley, Sophia & Emily Weinstein. (2023). 54.4 Authentic Supports for Digital Well-Being: Co-Designing Interventions With and for Adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 62(10). S409–S410. 1 indexed citations
5.
Subrahmanyam, Kaveri, Patti M. Valkenburg, Samuel E. Ehrenreich, et al.. (2022). Handbook of Adolescent Digital Media Use and Mental Health. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 26 indexed citations
6.
Meier, Brian P., Sara Konrath, Adam K. Fetterman, et al.. (2022). Development and Validation of the Single-Item Mindfulness Scale (SIMS). Journal of Personality Assessment. 105(6). 807–819. 5 indexed citations
7.
Weinstein, Emily & Carrie James. (2022). Behind Their Screens. The MIT Press eBooks. 27 indexed citations
8.
Weinstein, Emily, et al.. (2021). Positive and negative uses of social media among adolescents hospitalized for suicidal behavior. Journal of Adolescence. 87(1). 63–73. 40 indexed citations
9.
James, Carrie & Emily Weinstein. (2021). Children as Digital Citizens: insights from classroom research with digital dilemmas. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3 indexed citations
10.
Weinstein, Emily. (2018). The social media see-saw: Positive and negative influences on adolescents’ affective well-being. New Media & Society. 20(10). 3597–3623. 180 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
James, Carrie, Katie Davis, Linda Charmaraman, et al.. (2017). Digital Life and Youth Well-being, Social Connectedness, Empathy, and Narcissism. PEDIATRICS. 140(Supplement_2). S71–S75. 75 indexed citations
12.
Weinstein, Emily. (2017). Adolescents' differential responses to social media browsing: Exploring causes and consequences for intervention. Computers in Human Behavior. 76. 396–405. 76 indexed citations
13.
White, Allison E., Emily Weinstein, & Robert L. Selman. (2016). Adolescent friendship challenges in a digital context. Convergence The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. 24(3). 269–288. 10 indexed citations
14.
Thomas, Sara, Emily Weinstein, & Robert L. Selman. (2016). Did I Cross the Line?: Gender Differences in Adolescents’ Anonymous Digital Self-Reports of Wrongdoing in an Online Anonymous Context. Sex Roles. 77(1-2). 59–71. 5 indexed citations
15.
Weinstein, Emily, Robert L. Selman, Sara Thomas, et al.. (2015). How to Cope With Digital Stress. Journal of Adolescent Research. 31(4). 415–441. 35 indexed citations
16.
Weinstein, Emily. (2014). The Personal is Political on Social Media: Online Civic Expression Patterns and Pathways Among Civically Engaged Youth. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8. 24. 21 indexed citations
17.
Weinstein, Emily, et al.. (2014). A Decline in Creativity? It Depends on the Domain. Creativity Research Journal. 26(2). 174–184. 18 indexed citations
18.
Dinakar, Karthik, Emily Weinstein, Henry Lieberman, & Robert L. Selman. (2014). Stacked Generalization Learning to Analyze Teenage Distress. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 8(1). 81–90. 17 indexed citations
19.
Weinstein, Emily & Robert L. Selman. (2014). Digital stress: Adolescents’ personal accounts. New Media & Society. 18(3). 391–409. 69 indexed citations
20.
Weinstein, Emily. (1998). Elements of the Art of Practice in Mental Health. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 52(7). 579–585. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026