Emily Kothe

3.9k citations
64 papers · 2.5k · h-index 31

Impact in

Papers in

Emily Kothe

63 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Emily Kothe
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Applied Psychology 397
  • Clinical Psychology 381
  • Health 131
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 206
  • Marketing 155
Replace Rachel Povey with:
Rachel Povey United Kingdom
Tessa M. Pollard United Kingdom
Jay E. Maddock United States
Carol M. Devine United States
Chery Smith United States
Amy L. Yaroch United States
Helen Truby Australia
Andrew Prestwich United Kingdom
Leslie A. Lytle United States
F. Marijn Stok Netherlands
Emily Kothe relative to Rachel Povey United Kingdom Rachel Povey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Rachel Povey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Kothe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Kothe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Kothe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Kothe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Kothe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Kothe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Kothe. The network helps show where Emily Kothe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily Kothe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily Kothe Line = papers co-authored together Emily Kothe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009168
2 2019167
3 2019148
4 2014143
5 2015142
6 2012127
7 2019124
8 2014113
9 2012103
10 201093
11 201981
12 201372
13 202160
14 202045
15 201645
16 202144
17 201543
18 201443
19 201542
20 201441

About Emily Kothe

Emily Kothe is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 64 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (19 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (8 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (7 papers), Climate Change Communication and Perception (6 papers), Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (397 citations), Clinical Psychology (381 citations), Health (131 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (206 citations) and Marketing (155 citations). Emily Kothe has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Mullan, Mathew Ling, Cara Wong, Anna Klas, Phyllis Butow, Madelon North, Jemma Todd, Lauren A. Monds, Kirby Sainsbury and Helen Skouteris. Their work appears in journals such as Appetite, British Food Journal, BMC Public Health, Nurse Education in Practice and Health Psychology Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact