Kathleen O’Moore

1.7k citations
21 papers · 972 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 13
Topics
Digital Mental Health Interventions (13 papers)Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers)

In The Last Decade

Kathleen O’Moore

20 papers receiving 949 citations

Hit Papers

Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemi...20202026202220242020100200300

Peers

Kathleen O’Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Clinical Psychology 435
  • Social Psychology 257
  • Applied Psychology 240
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 209
  • General Health Professions 147
Replace Zeying Qin with:
Zeying Qin China
Sarah Wilding United Kingdom
Kristen Murray Australia
Jialing Wu China
Leilei Liang China
Ambrose J. Melson United Kingdom
Keith A. Edmonds United States
Kotaro Imamura Japan
Nora Dörrie Germany
Md Zahir Ahmed China
Kathleen O’Moore relative to Zeying Qin China Zeying Qin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×27.5×
Zeying Qin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen O’Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen O’Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen O’Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen O’Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen O’Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen O’Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen O’Moore. The network helps show where Kathleen O’Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen O’Moore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen O’Moore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen O’Moore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen O’Moore. Kathleen O’Moore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 19
4
Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australiabreakdown →
323
5 12
6 14
7 6
8 2
9 10
10 10
11 17
12 28
13 86
14 69
15 23
16 4
17 143
18 32
19 79
20 21

About Kathleen O’Moore

Kathleen O’Moore is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 972 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (13 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (240 citations), Clinical Psychology (435 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (209 citations). Kathleen O’Moore has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jill M. Newby, Helen Christensen, Kate Faasse, Samantha Tang, Alishia D. Williams, Gavin Andrews, Barbara Mullan, Cara Wong, Jessica Smith and Kristen Pickles. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Affective Disorders and BMC Public Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026