Kathleen O’Moore

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
21 papers, 972 citations indexed

About

Kathleen O’Moore is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kathleen O’Moore has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 972 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Applied Psychology, 10 papers in Clinical Psychology and 8 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kathleen O’Moore's work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (13 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers). Kathleen O’Moore is often cited by papers focused on Digital Mental Health Interventions (13 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (5 papers). Kathleen O’Moore collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Kathleen O’Moore's co-authors include Jill M. Newby, Helen Christensen, Kate Faasse, Samantha Tang, Alishia D. Williams, Gavin Andrews, Barbara Mullan, Cara Wong, Jessica Smith and Kirby Sainsbury and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Affective Disorders and BMC Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Kathleen O’Moore

20 papers receiving 949 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia

2020 323 citations Jill M. Newby, Kathleen O’Moore et al. PLoS ONE profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Kathleen O’Moore Australia	13	435	257	240	209	147	21	972
Jialing Wu China	10	480 1.1×	180 0.7×	118 0.5×	184 0.9×	148 1.0×	23	839
Md Zahir Ahmed China	10	846 1.9×	258 1.0×	131 0.5×	159 0.8×	152 1.0×	28	1.2k
Célia M. D. Sales Portugal	18	525 1.2×	270 1.1×	265 1.1×	156 0.7×	163 1.1×	56	1.1k
Dawn W. Foster United States	20	359 0.8×	110 0.4×	339 1.4×	131 0.6×	249 1.7×	61	1.3k
Tasneem L. Talib United States	12	289 0.7×	377 1.5×	163 0.7×	159 0.8×	106 0.7×	19	980
Omar Yousaf United Kingdom	7	492 1.1×	256 1.0×	81 0.3×	162 0.8×	143 1.0×	16	938
Abby L. Braitman United States	21	506 1.2×	325 1.3×	243 1.0×	121 0.6×	256 1.7×	94	1.2k
Raheem J. Paxton United States	28	265 0.6×	286 1.1×	234 1.0×	97 0.5×	279 1.9×	74	1.7k
Julia Velten Germany	19	657 1.5×	303 1.2×	150 0.6×	210 1.0×	253 1.7×	56	1.2k
Erin M. Bergner United States	18	217 0.5×	153 0.6×	78 0.3×	107 0.5×	329 2.2×	43	935

Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen O’Moore

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen O’Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen O’Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen O’Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen O’Moore

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen O’Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen O’Moore. The network helps show where Kathleen O’Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen O’Moore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen O’Moore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen O’Moore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen O’Moore. Kathleen O’Moore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

O’Moore, Kathleen, Sophie Li, Peter Baldwin, et al.. (2025). Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 1): Participatory Design Study including People with Lived and Living Experience. JMIR Human Factors. 12. e69499–e69499. 1 indexed citations

O’Moore, Kathleen, Alexis E. Whitton, Peter Baldwin, et al.. (2025). Needs and Expectations for the myNewWay Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Psychotherapy Model of Care for Depression and Anxiety (Part 2): Participatory Design Study including Mental Health Professionals. JMIR Human Factors. 12. e68789–e68789.

Whitton, Alexis E., Andrew Mackinnon, Kathleen O’Moore, et al.. (2021). Mental Health Screening in General Practices as a Means for Enhancing Uptake of Digital Mental Health Interventions: Observational Cohort Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 23(9). e28369–e28369. 19 indexed citations

Newby, Jill M., Kathleen O’Moore, Samantha Tang, Helen Christensen, & Kate Faasse. (2020). Acute mental health responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. PLoS ONE. 15(7). e0236562–e0236562. 323 indexed citations breakdown →

Shand, Fiona, Andrew Mackinnon, Kathleen O’Moore, et al.. (2019). The iBobbly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander app project: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 20(1). 198–198. 12 indexed citations

Proudfoot, Judith, et al.. (2019). Implementation of an augmented stepped mental health care service in Australian primary care: a mixed method study. Advances in Mental Health. 19(1). 75–93. 6 indexed citations

Anderson, Josephine, et al.. (2019). Stepped care mental health service in Australian primary care: codesign and feasibility study. Australian Health Review. 44(6). 873–879. 14 indexed citations

Anderson, Josephine, et al.. (2019). Implementation and cost effectiveness evaluation of an integrated mental health stepped care service for adults in primary care. International Journal of Integrated Care. 19(4). 446–446. 2 indexed citations

King, Catherine, et al.. (2018). General Practitioners’ Attitudes Toward a Web-Based Mental Health Service for Adolescents: Implications for Service Design and Delivery. JMIR Human Factors. 5(1). e12–e12. 10 indexed citations

10.

O’Dea, Bridianne, et al.. (2018). Parental attitudes towards an online, school-based, mental health service: implications for service design and delivery. Advances in Mental Health. 17(2). 146–160. 10 indexed citations

11.

O’Dea, Bridianne, et al.. (2017). School Counselors’ Perspectives of a Web-Based Stepped Care Mental Health Service for Schools: Cross-Sectional Online Survey. JMIR Mental Health. 4(4). e55–e55. 17 indexed citations

12.

Smith, Jessica, Jill M. Newby, Michael Murphy, et al.. (2017). Help from home for depression: A randomised controlled trial comparing internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy with bibliotherapy for depression. Internet Interventions. 9. 25–37. 28 indexed citations

13.

O’Moore, Kathleen, Jill M. Newby, Gavin Andrews, et al.. (2017). Internet Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy for Depression in Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthritis Care & Research. 70(1). 61–70. 86 indexed citations

14.

Williams, Alishia D., Kathleen O’Moore, Simon E. Blackwell, et al.. (2015). Positive imagery cognitive bias modification (CBM) and internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT): A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Affective Disorders. 178. 131–141. 69 indexed citations

15.

Williams, Alishia D., Rosanna Pajak, Kathleen O’Moore, Gavin Andrews, & Jessica R. Grisham. (2014). Internet-based cognitive bias modification for obsessive compulsive disorder: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 15(1). 193–193. 4 indexed citations

16.

Mullan, Barbara, Cara Wong, Emily Kothe, et al.. (2014). An examination of the demographic predictors of adolescent breakfast consumption, content, and context. BMC Public Health. 14(1). 264–264. 143 indexed citations

17.

Williams, Alishia D., Kathleen O’Moore, Elizabeth Mason, & Gavin Andrews. (2014). The effectiveness of internet cognitive behaviour therapy (iCBT) for social anxiety disorder across two routine practice pathways. Internet Interventions. 1(4). 225–229. 32 indexed citations

18.

Ligt, Joep de, Philip M. Boone, Rolph Pfundt, et al.. (2013). Detection of Clinically Relevant Copy Number Variants with Whole-Exome Sequencing. Human Mutation. 34(10). 1439–1448. 79 indexed citations

19.

Hawes, David J., Lisa Zadro, Elian Fink, et al.. (2012). The effects of peer ostracism on children's cognitive processes. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. 9(5). 599–613. 73 indexed citations

20.

Mullan, Barbara, Cara Wong, & Kathleen O’Moore. (2010). Predicting hygienic food handling behaviour: modelling the health action process approach. British Food Journal. 112(11). 1216–1229. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact