Jemma Todd

1.7k citations
66 papers · 1.1k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Jemma Todd

58 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Jemma Todd
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Applied Psychology 273
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 361
  • Pharmacology 272
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 306
  • Family Practice 26
Replace Dustin B. Wygant with:
Dustin B. Wygant United States
Linda M.G. Vancleef Netherlands
J. A. Skelton United States
Carmen Luciano Spain
Jeremiah Weinstock United States
Elaine M. Heiby United States
Claire M. Peterson United States
Kathryn Graff Low United States
Susan J. Thomas Australia
Neal Doran United States
Jemma Todd relative to Dustin B. Wygant United States Dustin B. Wygant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Dustin B. Wygant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jemma Todd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jemma Todd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jemma Todd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jemma Todd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jemma Todd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jemma Todd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jemma Todd. The network helps show where Jemma Todd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jemma Todd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jemma Todd Line = papers co-authored together Jemma Todd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015125
2 2014111
3 2018110
4 201170
5 201645
6 201542
7 201640
8 201335
9 201434
10 201334
11 201632
12 202031
13 201230
14 202329
15 201429
16 202224
17 202222
18 201522
19 202121
20 202121

About Jemma Todd

Jemma Todd is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (25 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (18 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (15 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (15 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (7 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (6 papers) and Mind wandering and attention (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (273 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (361 citations), Pharmacology (272 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (306 citations) and Family Practice (26 citations). Jemma Todd has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Barbara Mullan, Louise Sharpe, Ben Colagiuri, Emily Kothe, Lauren A. Monds, Patrick Clarke, Dimitri Van Ryckeghem, Geert Crombez, Blake F. Dear and Kathryn Nicholson Perry. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Behaviour Research and Therapy, Journal of Pain, Health Psychology Review and Clinical Psychology Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact