Emily J. Oliver

1.8k total citations
53 papers, 941 citations indexed

About

Emily J. Oliver is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily J. Oliver has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 941 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in General Health Professions, 15 papers in Health and 15 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emily J. Oliver's work include Health disparities and outcomes (14 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (11 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (11 papers). Emily J. Oliver is often cited by papers focused on Health disparities and outcomes (14 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (11 papers) and Physical Activity and Health (11 papers). Emily J. Oliver collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Serbia and United States. Emily J. Oliver's co-authors include David Tod, James Hardy, David Markland, Robert Morris, Caroline J. Dodd-Reynolds, Lauren Mawn, Coral L Hanson, Clare Bambra, Carole Torgerson and Christopher Bridle and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and Personality and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Emily J. Oliver

47 papers receiving 897 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emily J. Oliver United Kingdom 19 341 247 201 160 149 53 941
Gareth Wiltshire United Kingdom 13 274 0.8× 219 0.9× 119 0.6× 71 0.4× 98 0.7× 30 875
Andrew Miller Australia 23 366 1.1× 455 1.8× 212 1.1× 99 0.6× 284 1.9× 69 1.6k
Selina Khoo Malaysia 19 372 1.1× 127 0.5× 256 1.3× 221 1.4× 157 1.1× 81 1.5k
Meghan Casey Australia 22 391 1.1× 251 1.0× 225 1.1× 92 0.6× 53 0.4× 48 1.4k
David Trouilloud France 21 769 2.3× 429 1.7× 127 0.6× 225 1.4× 181 1.2× 41 1.4k
Hagen Wäsche Germany 17 153 0.4× 122 0.5× 146 0.7× 107 0.7× 48 0.3× 60 917
Nick Caddick United Kingdom 15 270 0.8× 185 0.7× 146 0.7× 34 0.2× 227 1.5× 34 1.0k
Kate Hefferon United Kingdom 20 484 1.4× 151 0.6× 158 0.8× 256 1.6× 533 3.6× 36 1.4k
Storm J. Russell Canada 13 586 1.7× 688 2.8× 142 0.7× 173 1.1× 53 0.4× 18 1.4k
Emma J. Stodel Canada 15 303 0.9× 389 1.6× 251 1.2× 93 0.6× 88 0.6× 41 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Emily J. Oliver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily J. Oliver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily J. Oliver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily J. Oliver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily J. Oliver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily J. Oliver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily J. Oliver. The network helps show where Emily J. Oliver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily J. Oliver

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily J. Oliver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily J. Oliver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily J. Oliver. Emily J. Oliver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
McKinlay, Alison, Jack M Birch, Fiona Graham, et al.. (2025). How populist-aligned views are reflected in people's accounts of the receipt of public health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Social Science & Medicine. 381. 118312–118312.
3.
Thomson, Katie, et al.. (2024). Effectiveness of Public Messaging Within the Gambling Domain: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 24(1). 347–380.
5.
Latinjak, Alexander T., Alain Morin, Thomas M. Brinthaupt, et al.. (2023). Self-Talk: An Interdisciplinary Review and Transdisciplinary Model. Review of General Psychology. 27(4). 355–386. 18 indexed citations
7.
Dodd-Reynolds, Caroline J., et al.. (2022). The understanding, application and influence of complexity in national physical activity policy-making. Health Research Policy and Systems. 20(1). 59–59. 12 indexed citations
8.
McGrath, Michael, Fiona Duncan, Cleo Baskin, et al.. (2021). Effectiveness of community interventions for protecting and promoting the mental health of working-age adults experiencing financial uncertainty: a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 75(7). 665–673. 19 indexed citations
9.
Duncan, Fiona, Cleo Baskin, Michael McGrath, et al.. (2021). Community interventions for improving adult mental health: mapping local policy and practice in England. BMC Public Health. 21(1). 1691–1691. 15 indexed citations
10.
Duncan, Fiona, Mike McGrath, Cleo Baskin, et al.. (2020). Delivery of community-centred public mental health interventions in diverse areas in England: a mapping study protocol. BMJ Open. 10(7). e037631–e037631. 5 indexed citations
11.
Hanson, Coral L, et al.. (2020). A modified Delphi study to gain consensus for a taxonomy to report and classify physical activity referral schemes (PARS). International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 17(1). 158–158. 19 indexed citations
12.
Dodd-Reynolds, Caroline J., et al.. (2020). Inequities and inequalities in outdoor walking groups: a scoping review. Public health reviews. 41(1). 4–4. 17 indexed citations
13.
Hanson, Coral L, Emily J. Oliver, Caroline J. Dodd-Reynolds, & Linda Allin. (2019). How do participant experiences and characteristics influence engagement in exercise referral? A qualitative longitudinal study of a scheme in Northumberland, UK. BMJ Open. 9(2). e024370–e024370. 21 indexed citations
15.
Hawkins, Jemma, Adrian Edwards, Joanna M Charles, et al.. (2017). Protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of the use of Physical ACtivity monitors in an Exercise Referral Setting: the PACERS study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 3(1). 51–51. 3 indexed citations
16.
Oliver, Emily J., et al.. (2015). Development and Validation of an Implicit Measure of Meta-Motivational States. Durham Research Online (Durham University). 4.
17.
Hoon, Alice E., et al.. (2014). Use of the ‘Stop, Start, Continue’ method is associated with the production of constructive qualitative feedback by students in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 40(5). 755–767. 50 indexed citations
18.
Hudson, Joanne, et al.. (2012). Functional and Psychological Changes During a Community Based 32 Week Postural Stability Training Programme: Recommendations for Future Practice. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University). 1 indexed citations
19.
Law, Rebecca‐Jane, Emily J. Oliver, Lauren Mawn, et al.. (2010). Perceptions of the effects of exercise on joint health in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Lara D. Veeken. 49(12). 2444–2451. 53 indexed citations
20.
Oliver, Emily J., David Markland, & James Hardy. (2009). Interpretation of self‐talk and post‐lecture affective states of higher education students: A self‐determination theory perspective. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 80(2). 307–323. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026