Emily Gray

706 citations
43 papers · 377 indexed · h-index 11
Topics
Gender Roles and Identity Studies (13 papers)Gender, Feminism, and Media (8 papers)LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers)

In The Last Decade

Emily Gray

38 papers receiving 360 citations

Peers

Emily Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Gender Studies 184
  • Social Psychology 152
  • Sociology and Political Science 132
  • Education 72
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22
Replace Carrie Mott with:
Carrie Mott United States
Allen Hill Australia
Iain Borden United Kingdom
Tiffany Lethabo King United States
Alexandre Jaunait France
Liz Taylor United Kingdom
Steve Craig United States
Tara Woodyer United Kingdom
Lincoln Allison United Kingdom
Emma Rush Australia
Emily Gray relative to Carrie Mott United States Carrie Mott's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Carrie Mott · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Gray. The network helps show where Emily Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Gray

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Gray. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Gray based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Gray. Emily Gray is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 2
4 2
5 6
6 13
7 2
8 2
9 1
10 3
11 36
12 15
13
Productivity in the broadacre and dairy industries.
4
14 79
15
Agricultural productivity : Trends and policies for growth
2
16 29
17
Improving productivity - the incentives for change
3
18 7
19
‘Miss, are you bisexual?’ The (re)production of heteronormativity within schools and the negotiation of Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual teachers’ private and professional worlds
9
20 14

About Emily Gray

Emily Gray is a scholar working on Gender Studies, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Social Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (13 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (8 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (184 citations), Social Psychology (152 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (132 citations). Emily Gray has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anne Harris, Tiffany Jones, Yu Sheng, Mindy Blaise, Lucy Nicholas, Jen Gilbert, Deana Leahy, Linda Knight, John D. Mullen and Jacqueline Ullman. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Sociology, The Journal of Urology and Ecological Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026