Jo Pike

535 citations
15 papers · 307 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jo Pike

14 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Jo Pike
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Pharmacy 26
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35
  • Sociology and Political Science 136
  • Education 92
  • Geography, Planning and Development 17
Replace Ruth Emond with:
Ruth Emond United Kingdom
Helene Aarseth Norway
Emily Truman Canada
Toni Liquori United States
Helene Brembeck Sweden
Pamela Goyan Kittler United States
Ashanté M. Reese United States
Nicklas Neuman Sweden
Ardyth H. Gillespie United States
Melissa J. Vilaro United States
Jo Pike relative to Ruth Emond United Kingdom Ruth Emond's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Ruth Emond · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Pike

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Pike more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Pike

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Pike. The network helps show where Jo Pike may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jo Pike, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo Pike Line = papers co-authored together Jo Pike links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 200896
2 201040
3 200931
4
School food and the pedagogies of parenting
201230
5 201330
6 201419
7
The Moral Geographies of Children, Young People and Food: Beyond Jamie's School Dinners
201416
8
Design of a clinical notification system.
199912
9 201612
10 20108
11 20137
12 20153
13 20172
14
The family meal as pedagogy: Governing families through mythologies of mealtimes
20171
15 20170

About Jo Pike

Jo Pike is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Speech and Hearing, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy and Food Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 307 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Children's Rights and Participation (5 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Tourism, Volunteerism, and Development (2 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (2 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), Culinary Culture and Tourism (2 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (2 papers) and Obesity and Health Practices (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (26 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (35 citations), Sociology and Political Science (136 citations), Education (92 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (17 citations). Jo Pike has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Derek Colquhoun, Deana Leahy, Peter J. Kelly, Pinki Sahota, Peter Kelly, Peter Kelly, Michael M. Wagner and Emily Gray. Their work appears in journals such as Children s Geographies, Celebrity Studies, Health Sociology Review, Health Promotion International and Health Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact