Carrie Mott

570 total citations · 1 hit paper
14 papers, 324 citations indexed

About

Carrie Mott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Geography, Planning and Development and Cultural Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Carrie Mott has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 324 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Geography, Planning and Development and 3 papers in Cultural Studies. Recurrent topics in Carrie Mott's work include Geography Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (3 papers) and Anarchism and Radical Politics (3 papers). Carrie Mott is often cited by papers focused on Geography Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (3 papers) and Anarchism and Radical Politics (3 papers). Carrie Mott collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Singapore. Carrie Mott's co-authors include Daniel Cockayne, Susan M. Roberts, Larry Knopp, Simon Springer, Jonathan M. Smith, Richard White, Federico Ferretti and James D. Sidaway and has published in prestigious journals such as Antipode, Social & Cultural Geography and Gender Place & Culture.

In The Last Decade

Carrie Mott

13 papers receiving 294 citations

Hit Papers

Citation matters: mobilizing the politics of citation tow... 2017 2026 2020 2023 2017 50 100 150

Peers

Carrie Mott
Anna Feigenbaum United Kingdom
Luke Dickens United Kingdom
Melissa Butcher United Kingdom
Erkan Saka Türkiye
Yi’En Cheng Singapore
Donald Horne Australia
Sherry Lee Linkon United States
Ealasaid Munro United Kingdom
Anna Feigenbaum United Kingdom
Carrie Mott
Citations per year, relative to Carrie Mott Carrie Mott (= 1×) peers Anna Feigenbaum

Countries citing papers authored by Carrie Mott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Carrie Mott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carrie Mott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carrie Mott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Carrie Mott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carrie Mott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carrie Mott. The network helps show where Carrie Mott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carrie Mott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carrie Mott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carrie Mott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carrie Mott. Carrie Mott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Mott, Carrie. (2023). “The Last Victims of the Indian War”: Celilo Falls, the Dalles Dam, and Infrastructural Colonization. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. 114(1). 91–106. 1 indexed citations
2.
Mott, Carrie. (2022). Theft: Grave robbery, territorial conquest, and irrigation. Environment and Planning E Nature and Space. 6(4). 2636–2653. 1 indexed citations
3.
Mott, Carrie & Daniel Cockayne. (2020). Understanding how hatred persists: situating digital harassment in the long history of white supremacy. Gender Place & Culture. 28(11). 1521–1540. 8 indexed citations
4.
Mott, Carrie. (2019). Oral Reading Fluency Scores as an Indicator of Reading Comprehension in Title I Schools. Scholars Crossing (Liberty University).
5.
Mott, Carrie & Daniel Cockayne. (2018). Conscientious disengagement and whiteness as a condition of dialogue. Dialogues in Human Geography. 8(2). 143–147. 8 indexed citations
6.
Mott, Carrie & Daniel Cockayne. (2017). Citation matters: mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of ‘conscientious engagement’. Gender Place & Culture. 24(7). 954–973. 163 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Mott, Carrie. (2017). Building Relationships within Difference: An Anarcha-Feminist Approach to the Micropolitics of Solidarity. Annals of the American Association of Geographers. 108(2). 424–433. 5 indexed citations
8.
Mott, Carrie. (2017). Precious work: white anti-racist pedagogies in Southern Arizona. Social & Cultural Geography. 20(2). 178–197. 8 indexed citations
9.
Sidaway, James D., Richard White, Federico Ferretti, et al.. (2017). The Anarchist Roots of Geography: Toward Spatial Emancipation. The AAG Review of Books. 5(4). 281–296. 8 indexed citations
10.
Mott, Carrie. (2016). Spaces of Solidarity. UKnowledge (University of Kentucky). 1 indexed citations
11.
Mott, Carrie. (2015). Notes from the Field: Re-living Tucson - Geographic Fieldwork as an Activist-Academic. 24. 33–41. 4 indexed citations
12.
Mott, Carrie, et al.. (2015). Making Space for Critical Pedagogy in the Neoliberal University: Struggles and Possibilities. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies. 14(4). 1260–1282. 20 indexed citations
13.
Mott, Carrie. (2015). The Activist Polis: Topologies of Conflict in Indigenous Solidarity Activism. Antipode. 48(1). 193–211. 23 indexed citations
14.
Mott, Carrie & Susan M. Roberts. (2013). Not Everyone Has (the) Balls: Urban Exploration and the Persistence of Masculinist Geography. Antipode. 46(1). 229–245. 74 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026