Carrie Mott
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Geography, Planning and Development top 2%
- Education
- Urban Studies top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Daniel CockayneSusan M. RobertsLarry KnoppSimon SpringerJonathan M. SmithRichard WhiteFederico FerrettiJames D. Sidaway
- Topics
- Geography Education and Pedagogy (4 papers)Geographies of human-animal interactions (3 papers)Anarchism and Radical Politics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSingapore
In The Last Decade
Carrie Mott
13 papers receiving 294 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Sociology and Political Science 154
- Geography, Planning and Development 108
- Education 42
- Urban Studies 40
- Political Science and International Relations 34
Countries citing papers authored by Carrie Mott
This map shows the geographic impact of Carrie Mott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Carrie Mott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Carrie Mott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Carrie Mott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Carrie Mott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Carrie Mott. The network helps show where Carrie Mott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Carrie Mott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Carrie Mott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Carrie Mott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Carrie Mott. Carrie Mott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | Oral Reading Fluency Scores as an Indicator of Reading Comprehension in Title I Schools | 0 |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | Citation matters: mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of ‘conscientious engagement’breakdown → | 163 |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | Notes from the Field: Re-living Tucson - Geographic Fieldwork as an Activist-Academic | 4 |
| 12 | Making Space for Critical Pedagogy in the Neoliberal University: Struggles and Possibilities | 20 |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 74 |
About Carrie Mott
Carrie Mott is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Cultural Studies and Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geography Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Geographies of human-animal interactions (3 papers) and Anarchism and Radical Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (108 citations), Urban Studies (40 citations) and Gender Studies (34 citations). Carrie Mott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Cockayne, Susan M. Roberts, Larry Knopp, Simon Springer, Jonathan M. Smith, Richard White, Federico Ferretti and James D. Sidaway. Their work appears in journals such as Antipode, Social & Cultural Geography and Gender Place & Culture.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.