Emily Drabinski
- Library and Information Sciences top 0.2%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Education top 10%
- Conservation top 2%
- Topics
- Library Science and Administration (11 papers)Library Science and Information Literacy (9 papers)Web and Library Services (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Journal of Academic LibrarianshipCollege & Research Libraries
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Emily Drabinski
29 papers receiving 340 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Library and Information Sciences 223
- Information Systems 145
- Sociology and Political Science 94
- Education 72
- Conservation 49
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Drabinski
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Drabinski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Drabinski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Drabinski more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Drabinski
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Drabinski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Drabinski. The network helps show where Emily Drabinski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Drabinski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Drabinski. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Drabinski based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Drabinski. Emily Drabinski is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | Representing Normal: The Problem of the Unmarked in Library Organization Systems | 2 |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | Becoming Librarians, Becoming Teachers: Kairos and Professional Identity / Devenir bibliothécaire, devenir enseignant : Le Kairos et l'identité professionnelle | 1 |
| 9 | What Collaboration Means to Me: The Infrastructure of Welcome | 2 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | Reconfiguring Race, Gender, and Sexuality | 1 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | Queering the Catalog: Queer Theory and the Politics of Correctionbreakdown → | 127 |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | Critical library instruction : theories and methods | 109 |
About Emily Drabinski
Emily Drabinski is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Human Factors and Ergonomics and Conservation, having authored 32 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Administration (11 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (9 papers) and Web and Library Services (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (223 citations), Conservation (49 citations) and Information Systems (145 citations). Emily Drabinski has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Scott Walter, Sarah T. Roberts and J. Elizabeth Clark. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Academic Librarianship and College & Research Libraries.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.