Emily Cox Pahnke

14 papers receiving 784 citations

Hit Papers

Who Takes You to the Dance? How Partners’ Institutional L...2015202620182022201550100150200250

Peers

Emily Cox Pahnke
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Accounting 408
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 400
  • Strategy and Management 289
  • Economics and Econometrics 175
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 119
Replace Taiyuan Wang with:
Taiyuan Wang China
Hana Milanov United States
Aya S. Chacar United States
Yuri Mishina United States
Lars Schweizer Germany
Charlene L. Nicholls‐Nixon Canada
Jinyu He Hong Kong
Joon Mahn Lee South Korea
Sebastiaan Van Doorn Australia
Michelle Rogan France
Emily Cox Pahnke relative to Taiyuan Wang China Taiyuan Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Taiyuan Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Cox Pahnke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Cox Pahnke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Cox Pahnke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Cox Pahnke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Cox Pahnke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Cox Pahnke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Cox Pahnke. The network helps show where Emily Cox Pahnke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Cox Pahnke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Cox Pahnke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Cox Pahnke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Cox Pahnke. Emily Cox Pahnke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 2
3 5
4 38
5 39
6 0
7 36
8 75
9 1
10
Who Takes You to the Dance? How Partners’ Institutional Logics Influence Innovation in Young Firms
0
11
Exposed: Venture Capital, Competitor Ties, and Entrepreneurial Innovation
0
12
Who Takes You to the Dance? How Partners’ Institutional Logics Influence Innovation in Young Firmsbreakdown →
293
13 100
14 0
15 1
16 152
17 62
18 2

About Emily Cox Pahnke

Emily Cox Pahnke is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting and Strategy and Management, having authored 18 papers that have together received 809 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Private Equity and Venture Capital (14 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (12 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (400 citations), Accounting (408 citations) and Business and International Management (45 citations). Emily Cox Pahnke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Riitta Katila, Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, Benjamin L. Hallen, Rory McDonald, Dan Wang, Michael D. Howard, Warren Boeker, Sonali Shah, Ji Youn Kim and Dan Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Strategic Management Journal and Administrative Science Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026