Emily Cox Pahnke
-
- Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences 12
- Accounting top 2%
- Private Equity and Venture Capital 14
- Corporate Finance and Governance 8
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Innovation and Knowledge Management 4
- Business Strategy and Innovation 1
-
- Complex Network Analysis Techniques 2
- Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence 1
-
- Innovation Policy and R&D 2
- Co-authors
- Riitta KatilaKathleen M. EisenhardtBenjamin L. HallenRory McDonaldDan WangMichael D. HowardWarren BoekerSonali Shah
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Emily Cox Pahnke
14 papers receiving 784 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Management of Technology and Innovation 400
- Accounting 408
- Business and International Management 45
- Strategy and Management 289
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 119
Countries citing papers authored by Emily Cox Pahnke
This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Cox Pahnke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Cox Pahnke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Cox Pahnke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Cox Pahnke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Cox Pahnke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Cox Pahnke. The network helps show where Emily Cox Pahnke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Emily Cox Pahnke, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 39 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 75 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 1 | |
| 10 | Who Takes You to the Dance? How Partners’ Institutional Logics Influence Innovation in Young Firms | 2015 | 0 |
| 11 | Exposed: Venture Capital, Competitor Ties, and Entrepreneurial Innovation | 2015 | 0 |
| 12 | Who Takes You to the Dance? How Partners’ Institutional Logics Influence Innovation in Young Firmsbreakdown → | 2015 | 293 |
| 13 | 2015 | 100 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 152 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 62 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 2 |
About Emily Cox Pahnke
Emily Cox Pahnke is a scholar working on Management of Technology and Innovation, Accounting and Strategy and Management, having authored 18 papers that have together received 809 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Private Equity and Venture Capital (14 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (12 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (8 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (4 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (2 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (2 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (1 paper) and Business Strategy and Innovation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (400 citations), Accounting (408 citations) and Business and International Management (45 citations). Emily Cox Pahnke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Riitta Katila, Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, Benjamin L. Hallen, Rory McDonald, Dan Wang, Michael D. Howard, Warren Boeker, Sonali Shah, Ji Youn Kim and Dan Wang.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.