Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The hydrogen-fueled internal combustion engine: a technical review
2006919 citationsChristopher White et al.profile →
Mechanics and Prediction of Turbulent Drag Reduction with Polymer Additives
2008571 citationsChristopher White et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher White
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher White more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher White
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher White. The network helps show where Christopher White may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher White
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher White.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher White based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher White. Christopher White is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Brehmer, Matthew, et al.. (2019). Timeline Storyteller: The Design & Deployment of an Interactive Authoring Tool for Expressive Timeline Narratives. 1–5.5 indexed citations
Cuevas, Juan Carlos, et al.. (2016). A simple model of inertial layer dynamics in turbulent boundary layers. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.1 indexed citations
Morrill-Winter, Caleb, et al.. (2012). Canonical boundary layer properties at high Reynolds number as measured in the UNH Flow Physics Facility. Bulletin of the American Physical Society.2 indexed citations
Dubief, Yves & Christopher White. (2011). Elastic turbulence in high Reynolds number polymer drag reduced flows. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 64.1 indexed citations
16.
Klewicki, Joseph, et al.. (2008). Refined Analysis of the Mean Momentum Balance in Rough-Wall Turbulent Boundary Layers. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 61.1 indexed citations
White, Christopher, et al.. (2006). Dynamical Contributions to the Skin Friction in Polymer Drag Reduced Wall-Bounded Turbulence. Bulletin of the American Physical Society. 59.2 indexed citations
19.
Doksum, Teresa, et al.. (2000). Workforce projections for optometry.. PubMed. 71(5). 284–300.6 indexed citations
20.
Surprenant, Aimée M., Mary P. Harper, Leah H. Jamieson, et al.. (1999). Familiarity and pronounceability of nouns and names. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers. 31(4). 638–649.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.