Emiko Ochiai

697 citations
24 papers · 364 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Emiko Ochiai

22 papers receiving 307 citations

Peers

Emiko Ochiai
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Demography 105
  • Gender Studies 79
  • Sociology and Political Science 268
  • Cultural Studies 34
  • Political Science and International Relations 86
Replace Lluís Flaquer with:
Lluís Flaquer Spain
Sara Moreno Spain
Silke Staab United States
Greta Gilbertson United States
Elena Vacchelli United Kingdom
Nicola Montagna United Kingdom
Elsa M. Chaney United States
Teresa Torns Spain
Arianne M. Gaetano United States
Lucy Williams United Kingdom
Emiko Ochiai relative to Lluís Flaquer Spain Lluís Flaquer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Lluís Flaquer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emiko Ochiai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emiko Ochiai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emiko Ochiai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emiko Ochiai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emiko Ochiai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emiko Ochiai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emiko Ochiai. The network helps show where Emiko Ochiai may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Emiko Ochiai, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emiko Ochiai Line = papers co-authored together Emiko Ochiai links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200992
2 201130
3 201429
4 200026
5 201425
6 201122
7 199822
8 199521
9 199820
10
Asia's New Mothers: Crafting gender roles and childcare networks in East and Southeast Asian societies
200818
11
The Japanese family system in transition
199716
12 201412
13 20146
14 20136
15 20136
16 20153
17 19982
18 20102
19
Debates over the Ie and the Stem Family: Orientalism East and West
20001
20
The Modern Family and Japanese Culture : Exploring the JapaneseMother-Child Relationship ( Women and the Family)
19891

About Emiko Ochiai

Emiko Ochiai is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Cultural Studies, Gender Studies and Finance, having authored 24 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Policy and Reform Studies (9 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (9 papers), Japanese History and Culture (7 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (2 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (2 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (2 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (105 citations), Gender Studies (79 citations), Sociology and Political Science (268 citations), Cultural Studies (34 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (86 citations). Emiko Ochiai has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Leo Aoi Hosoya, Satomi Kurosu, Robert D. Retherford and Danièle Bélanger. Their work appears in journals such as European Societies, Journal of Family History, Journal of Comparative Family Studies, Population and Development Review and Journal of Japanese Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact