Replace Journal of Family and Economic Issues with:
Journal of Family and Economic IssuesUnited States
Sociological PerspectivesUnited States
Marriage & Family ReviewUnited States
Sociological InquiryUnited States
Sociology CompassUnited States
Population Research and Policy ReviewUnited States
Sociological ForumUnited States
Gender Place & CultureUnited States
Sociological Research OnlineUnited Kingdom
Current SociologyUnited Kingdom
Journal of Family and Economic IssuesUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Journal of Comparative Family Studies
Journal of Comparative Family Studies · 1×
×1.011.6kSPS
×1.05.5kDEMOG
×1.36.0kGS
×0.62.2kCP
×1.55.0kSP
Citations per year, relative to Journal of Comparative Family Studies
Journal of Comparative Family Studies · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Journal of Comparative Family Studies
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Comparative Family Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Comparative Family Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Comparative Family Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Comparative Family Studies
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Comparative Family Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Comparative Family Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.