Elizabeth M. Clancy

844 total citations
38 papers, 561 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth M. Clancy is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth M. Clancy has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 561 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Gender Studies, 16 papers in Clinical Psychology and 9 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth M. Clancy's work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (22 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (10 papers) and Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (8 papers). Elizabeth M. Clancy is often cited by papers focused on Gender, Feminism, and Media (22 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (10 papers) and Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (8 papers). Elizabeth M. Clancy collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and India. Elizabeth M. Clancy's co-authors include Bianca Klettke, David John Hallford, John W. Toumbourou, David Mellor, Angela M. Crossman, Megan K. Maas, Kate Hall, Matthew Fuller‐Tyszkiewicz, Ian Fuelscher and Manoj Kumar Sharma and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers in Human Behavior and British Journal of Sports Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth M. Clancy

34 papers receiving 552 citations

Peers

Elizabeth M. Clancy
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Gender Studies 377
  • Clinical Psychology 265
  • Sociology and Political Science 189
  • Artificial Intelligence 76
  • Education 70
Replace Katy Day with:
Katy Day United Kingdom
Alison Grodzinski United States
Nadia Aghtaie United Kingdom
Jody M. Ross United States
John Fenaughty New Zealand
Fuensanta López Rosales Mexico
Bridgette Rickett United Kingdom
Tiffany L. Marcantonio United States
Katrien Symons Belgium
Georgia M. Winters United States
Katy Day United Kingdom View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Elizabeth M. Clancy
Elizabeth M. Clancy · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Elizabeth M. Clancy
Elizabeth M. Clancy · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth M. Clancy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth M. Clancy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth M. Clancy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth M. Clancy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth M. Clancy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth M. Clancy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth M. Clancy. The network helps show where Elizabeth M. Clancy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth M. Clancy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth M. Clancy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth M. Clancy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth M. Clancy. Elizabeth M. Clancy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 2
5 9
6 5
7 14
8 5
9 2
10 16
11 8
12 11
13 6
14 5
15 14
16 18
17 5
18 12
19 45
20 106

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026