Anna Booth

489 total citations
27 papers, 268 citations indexed

About

Anna Booth is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Booth has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 268 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Clinical Psychology, 10 papers in Social Psychology and 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Anna Booth's work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (10 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (9 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers). Anna Booth is often cited by papers focused on Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (10 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (9 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers). Anna Booth collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Anna Booth's co-authors include Jacqui A. Macdonald, George J. Youssef, Jennifer McIntosh, Pauline M. Camacho, Bradley J. Wright, Alexandra Schnabel, Siân A. McLean, Delyse Hutchinson, Larissa Rossen and Craig A. Olsson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Developmental Review and Family Relations.

In The Last Decade

Anna Booth

21 papers receiving 264 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna Booth Australia 8 168 123 68 41 40 27 268
Emilie Lacroix Canada 10 213 1.3× 111 0.9× 31 0.5× 36 0.9× 36 0.9× 23 328
Chantal P Delaquis France 4 201 1.2× 165 1.3× 70 1.0× 41 1.0× 79 2.0× 7 307
Roland Hart United States 6 142 0.8× 147 1.2× 71 1.0× 43 1.0× 51 1.3× 9 261
Betty Lin United States 12 212 1.3× 169 1.4× 72 1.1× 69 1.7× 62 1.6× 37 373
Kathleen Stanford United States 2 146 0.9× 108 0.9× 37 0.5× 26 0.6× 36 0.9× 3 297
Frédérique Teissèdre France 8 192 1.1× 183 1.5× 109 1.6× 55 1.3× 39 1.0× 13 359
Judith Murray Australia 9 206 1.2× 84 0.7× 37 0.5× 31 0.8× 74 1.9× 24 285
Paulina Pawlicka Poland 8 122 0.7× 126 1.0× 56 0.8× 61 1.5× 35 0.9× 28 288
Jaqueline Galdino Albuquerque Perrelli Brazil 8 95 0.6× 61 0.5× 41 0.6× 27 0.7× 18 0.5× 45 203
Julia Dunn United States 5 138 0.8× 45 0.4× 35 0.5× 17 0.4× 31 0.8× 14 220

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Booth. The network helps show where Anna Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Booth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Booth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Booth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Booth. Anna Booth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Booth, Anna, et al.. (2025). Enhancing Safety for Separating Families Affected by Domestic and Family Violence: A Scoping Review of Modifiable Factors. Trauma Violence & Abuse. 810009355–810009355. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hameed, Mohajer, et al.. (2024). Children’s Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Outcomes in Military Families: A Rapid Review. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 33(6). 1949–1967. 1 indexed citations
4.
Booth, Anna, et al.. (2023). The lived experience of stress for parents in the context of COVID‐19–related disruption. Family Relations. 72(4). 1511–1531. 2 indexed citations
5.
Greenwood, Christopher, et al.. (2023). Adverse experiences in early intimate relationships and next‐generation infant–mother attachment: findings from the ATP Generation 3 Study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy. 44(4). 537–548.
6.
Youssef, George J., Lauren M. Francis, Elizabeth Spry, et al.. (2023). Associations between maternal psychological distress and mother-infant bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Women s Mental Health. 26(4). 441–452. 46 indexed citations
7.
8.
9.
Clancy, Elizabeth M., Bradley J. Wright, Anna Booth, et al.. (2023). Universal Digital Programs for Promoting Mental and Relational Health for Parents of Young Children: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 27(1). 23–52. 14 indexed citations
10.
Booth, Anna, et al.. (2023). Multilevel Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Bioecological Systems Perspective of Parent and Child Experiences. Child & Youth Care Forum. 53(2). 411–437. 2 indexed citations
11.
Booth, Anna, Larissa Rossen, Élisabeth Fivaz-Depeursinge, et al.. (2023). Initiating the dialogue between infant mental health and family therapy: a qualitative inquiry and recommendations. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy. 44(4). 412–439. 2 indexed citations
12.
McIntosh, Jennifer, et al.. (2023). Family Cohesion and Relationship Quality in Defence Force Families: Rapid Review. Open Journal of Social Sciences. 11(3). 56–93. 2 indexed citations
13.
McIntosh, Jennifer, Christopher Greenwood, Anna Booth, et al.. (2023). Infant and preschool attachment, continuity and relationship to caregiving sensitivity: findings from a new population‐based Australian cohort. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 65(1). 64–76. 5 indexed citations
14.
Booth, Anna, Christopher Greenwood, George J. Youssef, et al.. (2022). Factor structure of the Mini‐Maternal Behavior Q‐Sort and associations with infant attachment: Informing precision in research and intervention. Infancy. 28(2). 454–463. 2 indexed citations
15.
Gray, David, et al.. (2022). Developing an alternative approach to the measurement of B2B relationship health. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 35(8). 2066–2092.
16.
McLean, Siân A., et al.. (2021). Exploring the Efficacy of Telehealth for Family Therapy Through Systematic, Meta-analytic, and Qualitative Evidence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 24(2). 244–266. 50 indexed citations
17.
McIntosh, Jennifer, et al.. (2021). Exploring Perinatal Indicators of Infant Social-Emotional Development: A Review of the Replicated Evidence. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 24(3). 450–483. 16 indexed citations
18.
Clancy, Elizabeth M., et al.. (2020). Training maternal and child health nurses in early relational trauma: An evaluation of the MERTIL workforce training. Nurse Education Today. 89. 104390–104390. 12 indexed citations
19.
Booth, Anna & Pauline M. Camacho. (2013). A Closer Look at Calcium Absorption and the Benefits and Risks of Dietary Versus Supplemental Calcium. Postgraduate Medicine. 125(6). 73–81. 21 indexed citations
20.
Booth, Anna, Amanda LeCouteur, & Anna Chur‐Hansen. (2012). The impact of the desktop computer on rheumatologist–patient consultations. Clinical Rheumatology. 32(3). 391–393. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Emilie Lacroix Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chantal P Delaquis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Roland Hart Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Betty Lin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Kathleen Stanford Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Frédérique Teissèdre Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Judith Murray Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Paulina Pawlicka Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jaqueline Galdino Albuquerque Perrelli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julia Dunn
Rankless by CCL
2026