Edward C. Sherer
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Organic Chemistry top 2%
- Spectroscopy top 2%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Computational Theory and Mathematics top 1%
- Co-authors
- Christopher J. CramerYu‐hong LamDaniel A. DiRoccoChristopher J. WelchLeo A. JoyceCharles A. LaughtonModesto OrozcoDanielle M. Schultz
- Topics
- Computational Drug Discovery Methods (21 papers)Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (18 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (17 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSpain
In The Last Decade
Edward C. Sherer
87 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Molecular Biology 979
- Organic Chemistry 973
- Spectroscopy 488
- Materials Chemistry 374
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 365
Countries citing papers authored by Edward C. Sherer
This map shows the geographic impact of Edward C. Sherer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Edward C. Sherer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Edward C. Sherer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Edward C. Sherer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Edward C. Sherer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Edward C. Sherer. The network helps show where Edward C. Sherer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Edward C. Sherer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Edward C. Sherer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Edward C. Sherer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Edward C. Sherer. Edward C. Sherer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 92 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | The merger of decatungstate and copper catalysis to enable aliphatic C(sp3)–H trifluoromethylationbreakdown → | 274 |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | 121 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 28 | |
| 17 | 137 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Edward C. Sherer
Edward C. Sherer is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 90 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (21 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (18 papers) and Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (973 citations), Spectroscopy (488 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (339 citations). Edward C. Sherer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Christopher J. Cramer, Yu‐hong Lam, Daniel A. DiRocco, Christopher J. Welch, Leo A. Joyce, Charles A. Laughton, Modesto Orozco, Danielle M. Schultz, Louis‐Charles Campeau and Patrick Sarver. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Angewandte Chemie International Edition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.