Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds
2017225 citationsÉdouard MacheryOxford University Press eBooksprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Édouard Machery
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Édouard Machery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Édouard Machery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Édouard Machery more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Édouard Machery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Édouard Machery. The network helps show where Édouard Machery may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Édouard Machery
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Édouard Machery.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Édouard Machery based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Édouard Machery. Édouard Machery is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Smith, Kristopher M., et al.. (2021). Evaluating Information and Misinformation during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence for Epistemic Vigilance. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 43(43).2 indexed citations
7.
Machery, Édouard. (2017). Philosophy Within Its Proper Bounds. Oxford University Press eBooks.225 indexed citations breakdown →
Machery, Édouard. (2012). Expertise and Intuitions about Reference. THEORIA An International Journal for Theory History and Foundations of Science. 27(1). 37–54.63 indexed citations
14.
Cova, Florián, et al.. (2012). La philosophie expérimentale. D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh).1 indexed citations
Machery, Édouard & H. Clark Barrett. (2006). David J. Buller: Adapting minds: Evolutionary psychology and the persistent Quest for human nature,. Philosophy of Science. 73(2).3 indexed citations
17.
Machery, Édouard, et al.. (2005). The Compositionality of Concepts and Meanings: Foundational Issues. 45(9). 590–4.6 indexed citations
18.
Machery, Édouard, Markus Werning, & Gerhard Schurz. (2005). The Compositionality of Meaning and Content Volume II: Applications to Linguistics, Psychology and Neuroscience.3 indexed citations
Katsikopoulos, Konstantinos V., Édouard Machery, Thorsten Pachur, & Annika Wallin. (2004). The Search for Models of Clinical Judgment: Fast, Frugal, and Friendly in Paul Meehl's Spirit. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.