This map shows the geographic impact of Lori Gruen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lori Gruen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lori Gruen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lori Gruen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lori Gruen. The network helps show where Lori Gruen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lori Gruen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lori Gruen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lori Gruen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lori Gruen. Lori Gruen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gruen, Lori, et al.. (2012). Reflecting on nature : readings in environmental ethics and philosophy. Oxford University Press eBooks.4 indexed citations
Gruen, Lori, Laura Grabel, & Peter Singer. (2007). Stem Cell Research: The Ethical Issues. Wesleyan University Digital Collections (Wesleyan University).11 indexed citations
Gruen, Lori & Dale Jamieson. (1994). Reflecting on Nature: Readings in Environmental Philosophy. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).28 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.