Joachim Horvath
- Philosophy top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Alex WiegmannThomas GrundmannSteffen KochEugen FischerPaul E. EngelhardtJennifer NadoÉdouard MacheryDouglas W. Brown
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (16 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
Joachim Horvath
23 papers receiving 221 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Philosophy 176
- Cognitive Neuroscience 126
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 96
- History and Philosophy of Science 42
- Sociology and Political Science 21
Countries citing papers authored by Joachim Horvath
This map shows the geographic impact of Joachim Horvath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joachim Horvath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joachim Horvath more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joachim Horvath
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joachim Horvath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joachim Horvath. The network helps show where Joachim Horvath may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joachim Horvath
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joachim Horvath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joachim Horvath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joachim Horvath. Joachim Horvath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | Blame Blocking and Expertise Effects Revisited | 2 |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | Not as Bad as Painted? Legal Expertise, Intentionality Ascription, and Outcome Effects Revisited. | 5 |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 43 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | Die experimentelle Philosophie in der Diskussion | 3 |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | Testimony, Transmission, and Safety | 1 |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | [On radiation injuries to growing bone]. | 1 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Joachim Horvath
Joachim Horvath is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 239 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (16 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (176 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (42 citations) and General Decision Sciences (16 citations). Joachim Horvath has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Alex Wiegmann, Thomas Grundmann, Steffen Koch, Eugen Fischer, Paul E. Engelhardt, Jennifer Nado, Édouard Machery, Douglas W. Brown and F Horváth. Their work appears in journals such as Cognitive Science, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Bell System Technical Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.