Justin Sytsma
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Jonathan LivengoodÉdouard MacheryDavid RoséWesley BuckwalterKevin ReuterDylan MurrayEugen FischerRichard Scheines
- Topics
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (33 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (26 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Justin Sytsma
52 papers receiving 710 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Cognitive Neuroscience 519
- Philosophy 407
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 216
- Social Psychology 189
- Sociology and Political Science 114
Countries citing papers authored by Justin Sytsma
This map shows the geographic impact of Justin Sytsma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Justin Sytsma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Justin Sytsma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Justin Sytsma
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Justin Sytsma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Justin Sytsma. The network helps show where Justin Sytsma may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Justin Sytsma
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Justin Sytsma. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Justin Sytsma based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Justin Sytsma. Justin Sytsma is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Two Origin Stories for Experimental Philosophy | 3 |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 24 | |
| 13 | 43 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | On the Relevance of Folk Intuitions: A Reply to Talbot | 4 |
| 17 | Dennett’s Theory of the Folk Theory of Consciousness | 18 |
| 18 | 55 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Justin Sytsma
Justin Sytsma is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 788 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (33 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (26 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (407 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (519 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (103 citations). Justin Sytsma has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Livengood, Édouard Machery, David Rosé, Wesley Buckwalter, Kevin Reuter, Dylan Murray, Eugen Fischer, Richard Scheines, Adam Feltz and Peter Machamer. Their work appears in journals such as Cognition, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy of Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.