Eddy Nahmias
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Thomas NadelhofferJason TurnerStephen G. MorrisJason ShepardTrevor KvaranDylan MurrayD. Justin CoatesChandra Sripada
- Topics
- Free Will and Agency (22 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers)Philosophical Ethics and Theory (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsAustralia
In The Last Decade
Eddy Nahmias
34 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
- Philosophy 459
- Sociology and Political Science 243
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 180
- Social Psychology 175
Countries citing papers authored by Eddy Nahmias
This map shows the geographic impact of Eddy Nahmias's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eddy Nahmias with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eddy Nahmias more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eddy Nahmias
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eddy Nahmias. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eddy Nahmias. The network helps show where Eddy Nahmias may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eddy Nahmias
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eddy Nahmias. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eddy Nahmias based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eddy Nahmias. Eddy Nahmias is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | Why Do Women Leave Philosophy? Surveying Students at the Introductory Level | 32 |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 58 | |
| 8 | 130 | |
| 9 | 45 | |
| 10 | La philosophie expérimentale | 1 |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | Is Neuroscience the Death of Free Will | 3 |
| 13 | Moral Psychology: Historical and Contemporary Readings | 22 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | Autonomous agency and the threat of social psychology | 1 |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | The phenomenology of free will | 60 |
| 20 | Verbal reports on the contents of consciousness: Reconsidering introspectionist methodology | 10 |
About Eddy Nahmias
Eddy Nahmias is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Free Will and Agency (22 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Philosophy (459 citations) and General Decision Sciences (73 citations). Eddy Nahmias has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Thomas Nadelhoffer, Jason Turner, Stephen G. Morris, Jason Shepard, Trevor Kvaran, Dylan Murray, D. Justin Coates, Chandra Sripada, Lisa Thomson Ross and Oisín Deery. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.