Christopher Peacocke
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.2%
- Philosophy top 0.05%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.05%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Saul A. KripkeDavid LewisTyler BurgeAmélie Oksenberg RortyJohn R. SearleKim SterelnyThomas NagelJohn McDowell
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (39 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (21 papers)Classical Philosophy and Thought (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomMexico
In The Last Decade
Christopher Peacocke
100 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.6k
- Philosophy 2.4k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
- History and Philosophy of Science 1.1k
- Social Psychology 460
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Peacocke
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Peacocke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Peacocke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Peacocke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Peacocke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Peacocke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Peacocke. The network helps show where Christopher Peacocke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Peacocke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Peacocke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Peacocke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Peacocke. Christopher Peacocke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | Understanding Logical Constants: A Realists Account. | 19 |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | The Past, Necessity, Externalism and Entitlement | 5 |
| 12 | 29 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 119 | |
| 15 | Sense and Content: Experience, Thought & Their Relations | 2 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 232 | |
| 20 | 32 |
About Christopher Peacocke
Christopher Peacocke is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 106 papers that have together received 4.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (39 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (21 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (1.1k citations), Philosophy (2.4k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (2.6k citations). Christopher Peacocke has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Saul A. Kripke, David Lewis, Tyler Burge, Amélie Oksenberg Rorty, John R. Searle, Kim Sterelny, Thomas Nagel, John McDowell, Graeme Forbes and Susan Haack. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.