Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Human Aspects of Information Security Questionnaire (HAIS-Q): Two further validation studies
2017216 citationsKathryn Parsons, Dragana Calic et al.Computers & Securityprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Dragana Calic's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dragana Calic with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dragana Calic more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dragana Calic. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dragana Calic. The network helps show where Dragana Calic may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dragana Calic
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dragana Calic.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dragana Calic based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dragana Calic. Dragana Calic is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Butavicius, Marcus, et al.. (2017). Understanding susceptibility to phishing emails: Assessing the impact of individual differences and culture.. 12–23.17 indexed citations
10.
Reeves, Andrew, Kathryn Parsons, & Dragana Calic. (2017). Securing mobile devices: Evaluating the relationship between risk perception, organisational commitment and information security awareness.. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 145–155.1 indexed citations
11.
McCormac, Agata, et al.. (2017). Understanding the Relationships between Resilience, Work Stress and Information Security Awareness.. 80–90.4 indexed citations
Parsons, Kathryn, et al.. (2017). ‘Anti’-Social Media: Narcissism and Self-Control as Predictors of Facebook Self-Disclosure. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
15.
Calic, Dragana, Malcolm Pattinson, Kathryn Parsons, Marcus Butavicius, & Agata McCormac. (2016). Naïve and Accidental Behaviours that Compromise Information Security: What the Experts Think.. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide). 12–21.12 indexed citations
16.
Pattinson, Malcolm, Marcus Butavicius, Kathryn Parsons, et al.. (2016). The Information Security Awareness of Bank Employees.. 189–198.7 indexed citations
McCormac, Agata, et al.. (2016). Test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the Human Aspects of Information Security Questionnaire (HAIS-Q). Journal of the Association for Information Systems.12 indexed citations
20.
Parsons, Kathryn, et al.. (2016). Self-Disclosure on Facebook: Comparing two Research Organisations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.