Ian McKee

1.0k total citations
23 papers, 716 citations indexed

About

Ian McKee is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Ian McKee has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 716 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 15 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Ian McKee's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (7 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (6 papers). Ian McKee is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Forgiveness and Related Behaviors (7 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (6 papers). Ian McKee collaborates with scholars based in Australia and United Kingdom. Ian McKee's co-authors include N. T. Feather, Peter Strelan, Michael Wenzel, Walter Muir, Anthony J. Pelosi, V. Murray, Douglas Blackwood, David Young, Lydia Woodyatt and Robert J. Boeckmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Medicine, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Ian McKee

23 papers receiving 673 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ian McKee Australia 17 436 419 188 134 61 23 716
Cassandra L. Govan Australia 6 581 1.3× 340 0.8× 276 1.5× 114 0.9× 30 0.5× 7 764
Naomi Struch Israel 6 496 1.1× 586 1.4× 87 0.5× 157 1.2× 84 1.4× 8 783
Sarah Forrest United Kingdom 8 244 0.6× 180 0.4× 192 1.0× 61 0.5× 45 0.7× 16 655
Guy Foster Bachman United States 9 521 1.2× 597 1.4× 174 0.9× 63 0.5× 71 1.2× 11 876
Jennifer Lilgendahl United States 13 296 0.7× 508 1.2× 354 1.9× 107 0.8× 41 0.7× 21 1.1k
Erin M. O’Mara United States 11 432 1.0× 301 0.7× 169 0.9× 98 0.7× 23 0.4× 19 634
Kate J. Diebels United States 7 369 0.8× 238 0.6× 194 1.0× 71 0.5× 21 0.3× 9 622
Valeschka Martins Guerra Brazil 11 329 0.8× 253 0.6× 140 0.7× 116 0.9× 73 1.2× 51 633
Karen Kugler United States 6 469 1.1× 240 0.6× 336 1.8× 147 1.1× 22 0.4× 7 772
Ella Daniel Israel 19 676 1.6× 459 1.1× 323 1.7× 184 1.4× 16 0.3× 44 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Ian McKee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian McKee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian McKee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian McKee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian McKee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian McKee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian McKee. The network helps show where Ian McKee may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian McKee

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian McKee. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian McKee based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ian McKee. Ian McKee is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Condon, John T., Mary A. Luszcz, & Ian McKee. (2016). The transition to grandparenthood: a prospective study of mental health implications. Aging & Mental Health. 22(3). 336–343. 18 indexed citations
2.
Mooney, Louise, Peter Strelan, & Ian McKee. (2015). How forgiveness promotes offender pro‐relational intentions: The mediating role of offender gratitude. British Journal of Social Psychology. 55(1). 44–64. 16 indexed citations
3.
Strelan, Peter, Ian McKee, & N. T. Feather. (2015). When and how forgiving benefits victims: Post‐transgression offender effort and the mediating role of deservingness judgements. European Journal of Social Psychology. 46(3). 308–322. 17 indexed citations
4.
Feather, N. T., Michael Wenzel, & Ian McKee. (2012). Integrating multiple perspectives on schadenfreude: The role of deservingness and emotions. Motivation and Emotion. 37(3). 574–585. 60 indexed citations
5.
Feather, N. T. & Ian McKee. (2012). Values, Right‐Wing Authoritarianism, Social Dominance Orientation, and Ambivalent Attitudes Toward Women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 42(10). 2479–2504. 55 indexed citations
6.
Strelan, Peter, et al.. (2012). For whom do we forgive? A functional analysis of forgiveness. Personal Relationships. 20(1). 124–139. 31 indexed citations
7.
Strelan, Peter, et al.. (2011). Retributive and Inclusive Justice Goals and Forgiveness: The Influence of Motivational Values. Social Justice Research. 24(2). 126–142. 20 indexed citations
8.
Feather, N. T., Lydia Woodyatt, & Ian McKee. (2011). Predicting support for social action: How values, justice-related variables, discrete emotions, and outcome expectations influence support for the Stolen Generations. Motivation and Emotion. 36(4). 516–528. 28 indexed citations
10.
Strelan, Peter, N. T. Feather, & Ian McKee. (2008). Justice and forgiveness: Experimental evidence for compatibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 44(6). 1538–1544. 27 indexed citations
11.
Feather, N. T. & Ian McKee. (2008). Differentiating emotions in relation to deserved or undeserved outcomes: A retrospective study of real-life events. Cognition & Emotion. 23(5). 955–977. 29 indexed citations
12.
McKee, Ian & N. T. Feather. (2008). Revenge, Retribution, and Values: Social Attitudes and Punitive Sentencing. Social Justice Research. 21(2). 138–163. 85 indexed citations
13.
Feather, N. T. & Ian McKee. (2008). Values and prejudice: Predictors of attitudes towards Australian Aborigines. Australian Journal of Psychology. 60(2). 80–90. 64 indexed citations
14.
Murray, V., Ian McKee, P. Miller, et al.. (2004). Dimensions and classes of psychosis in a population cohort: a four-class, four-dimension model of schizophrenia and affective psychoses. Psychological Medicine. 35(4). 499–510. 60 indexed citations
15.
Feather, N. T., Robert J. Boeckmann, & Ian McKee. (2001). Reactions to an offense in relation to authoritarianism, knowledge about risk, and freedom of action. European Journal of Social Psychology. 31(2). 109–126. 16 indexed citations
16.
Feather, N. T., Robert J. Boeckmann, & Ian McKee. (2001). Jail sentence, community service, or compensation?. Australian Journal of Psychology. 53(2). 92–102. 12 indexed citations
17.
Feather, N. T. & Ian McKee. (1993). Global Self-Esteem and Attitudes Toward the High Achiever for Australian and Japanese Students. Social Psychology Quarterly. 56(1). 65–65. 48 indexed citations
18.
Feather, N. T., et al.. (1992). A Comparative Study of the Value Priorities of Australians, Australian Baha'is, and Expatriate Iranian Baha'is. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 23(1). 95–106. 7 indexed citations
19.
Feather, N. T. & Ian McKee. (1992). Australian and japanese attitudes towards the fall of high achievers. Australian Journal of Psychology. 44(2). 87–93. 7 indexed citations
20.
Feather, N. T., et al.. (1991). Attitudes towards high achievers in public life: Attributions, deservingness, personality, and affect. Australian Journal of Psychology. 43(2). 85–91. 32 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026